Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35671415›Full record

ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2022

Analytical Validation of a Deep Neural Network Algorithm for the Detection of Ovarian Cancer.

Gerard Reilly, Rowan G Bullock, Jessica Greenwood, Daniel R Ure, Erin Stewart, Pierre Davidoff, Justin DeGrazia, Herbert Fritsche, Charles J Dunton, Nitin Bhardwaj and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Gerard ReillyAxia Women's Health, Cincinnati, OH.
Rowan G BullockAspira Women's Health, Trumbull, CT.ORCID 0000-0002-4973-385X
Jessica GreenwoodAspira Women's Health, Trumbull, CT.ORCID 0000-0002-5130-9513
Daniel R UreAspira Women's Health, Trumbull, CT.
Erin StewartAspira Women's Health, Trumbull, CT.
Pierre DavidoffAspira Women's Health, Trumbull, CT.
Justin DeGraziaAspira Women's Health, Trumbull, CT.ORCID 0000-0003-3927-0254
Herbert FritscheAspira Women's Health, Trumbull, CT.ORCID 0000-0002-3415-3238
Charles J DuntonAspira Women's Health, Trumbull, CT.
Nitin BhardwajAspira Women's Health, Trumbull, CT.
Lesley E NorthropAspira Women's Health, Trumbull, CT.ORCID 0000-0003-2585-1525

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEarly detection of ovarian cancer, the deadliest gynecologic cancer, is crucial for reducing mortality. Current noninvasive risk assessment measures include protein biomarkers in combination with other clinical factors, which vary in their accuracy. Machine learning can be applied to optimizing the combination of these features, leading to more accurate assessment of malignancy. However, the low prevalence of the disease can make rigorous validation of these tests challenging and can result in unbalanced performance.

methodsMIA3G is a deep feedforward neural network for ovarian cancer risk assessment, using seven protein biomarkers along with age and menopausal status as input features. The algorithm was developed on a heterogenous data set of 1,067 serum specimens from women with adnexal masses (prevalence = 31.8%). It was subsequently validated on a cohort almost twice that size (N = 2,000).

resultsIn the analytical validation data set (prevalence = 4.9%), MIA3G demonstrated a sensitivity of 89.8% and a specificity of 84.02%. The positive predictive value was 22.45%, and the negative predictive value was 99.38%. When stratified by cancer type and stage, MIA3G achieved sensitivities of 94.94% for epithelial ovarian cancer, 76.92% for early-stage cancer, and 98.04% for late-stage cancer.

conclusionThe balanced performance of MIA3G leads to a high sensitivity and high specificity, a combination that may be clinically useful for providers in evaluating the appropriate management strategy for their patients. Limitations of this work include the largely retrospective nature of the data set and the unequal, albeit random, assignment of histologic subtypes between the training and validation data sets. Future directions may include the addition of new biomarkers or other modalities to strengthen the performance of the algorithm.

Indexed as

Ovarian NeoplasmsAlgorithmsBiomarkersCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleHumansNeural Networks, ComputerRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID35671415
PMCPMC9225600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.