Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35671402›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT2022

Assessment of Walking Speed and Distance Post-Stroke Increases After Providing a Theory-Based Toolkit.

Nancy M Salbach, Marilyn MacKay-Lyons, Jo-Anne Howe, Alison McDonald, Patricia Solomon, Mark T Bayley, Sara McEwen, Michelle Nelson, Beverly Bulmer, Gina S Lovasi

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05679011 (Analysis of Optimal Acceleration/Deceleration Distance in Gait Speed Tests With Motion Capture System in Chronic Post-stroke. Cross-sectional Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05679011 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Analysis of Optimal Acceleration/Deceleration Distance in Gait Speed Tests With Motion Capture System in Chronic Post-stroke. Cross-sectional Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversitat Internacional de CatalunyaRan2023 to 2024Enrolled50ConditionsStroke, Chronic StrokeArms4 and 6 meters walking test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nancy M SalbachDepartments of Physical Therapy (N.M.S., J.A.H., B.B.) and Medicine (M.T.B.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; The KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada (N.M.S., J.A.H., M.T.B.); School of Physiotherapy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada (M.M.L.); Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada (A.M.); School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada (P.S.); Selkirk College, Castlegar, Canada (S.M.); Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada (M.N.); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (M.N.); Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada (B.B.); and Dornsife School of Public Health, Urban Health Collaborative, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (G.S.L.).
Marilyn MacKay-Lyons
Jo-Anne Howe
Alison McDonald
Patricia Solomon
Mark T Bayley
Sara McEwen
Michelle Nelson
Beverly Bulmer
Gina S Lovasi

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeWhile underutilized, poststroke administration of the 10-m walk test (10mWT) and 6-minute walk test (6MWT) can improve care and is considered best practice. We aimed to evaluate provision of a toolkit designed to increase use of these tests by physical therapists (PTs).

methodsIn a before-and-after study, 54 PTs and professional leaders in 9 hospitals were provided a toolkit and access to a clinical expert over a 5-month period. The toolkit comprised a guide, smartphone app, and video, and described how to set up walkways, implement learning sessions, administer walk tests, and interpret and apply test results clinically. The proportion of hospital visits for which each walk test score was documented at least once (based on abstracted health records of ambulatory patients) were compared over 8-month periods pre- and post-intervention using generalized mixed models.

resultsData from 347 and 375 pre- and postintervention hospital visits, respectively, were analyzed. Compared with preintervention, the odds of implementing the 10mWT were 12 times greater (odds ratio [OR] = 12.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.8, 26.3), and of implementing the 6MWT were approximately 4 times greater (OR = 3.9, 95% CI 2.3, 6.7), post-intervention, after adjusting for hospital setting, ambulation ability, presence of aphasia and cognitive impairment, and provider-level clustering. Unadjusted change in the percentage of visits for which the 10mWT/6MWT was documented at least once was smallest in acute care settings (2.0/3.8%), and largest in inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation settings (28.0/19.9% and 29.4/23.4%, respectively). DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsProviding a comprehensive toolkit to hospitals with professional leaders likely contributed to increasing 10mWT and 6MWT administration during inpatient and outpatient stroke rehabilitation.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A390 ).

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationHumansWalkingWalking SpeedWalk Test

Identifiers

PMID35671402
PMCPMC9462135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.