Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35671133›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2022

Reframe the pain: Divided attention and positive memory reframing to reduce needle pain and distress in children-A feasibility randomized controlled trial.

Felicity A Braithwaite, Melanie Noel, Hannah G Jones, Michael D Wiese, Cara G Nania, Emily Watson, Tasha R Stanton

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of pain (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Felicity A BraithwaiteIIMPACT in Health, The University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6676-026X
Melanie NoelDepartment of Psychology, The University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3752-8055
Hannah G JonesIIMPACT in Health, The University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Michael D WieseClinical & Health Sciences, The University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3255-9242
Cara G NaniaSchool and Applied Child Psychology, The University of Calgary, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Emily WatsonIIMPACT in Health, The University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3139-2946
Tasha R StantonIIMPACT in Health, The University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7106-4456
University of South Australia · AUUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNegative experiences of needle procedures in childhood can lead to medical avoidance and vaccine hesitancy into adulthood. We evaluated the feasibility of two new interventions provided by clinical nurses to reduce the negative impact of vaccinations: divided attention (DA) and positive memory reframing (PMR).

methodsChildren (8-12 years) were randomized into four groups: usual care (UC), DA, PMR or combined (DA + PMR). To evaluate feasibility, we undertook in-depth analysis of video-recorded interventions, nurse experiences (phone interviews) and child/parent memory recall of interventions (phone interviews at 2 weeks post-vaccination). Key clinical outcomes included child and parent ratings of needle-related pain intensity and fear assessed at baseline, immediately post-vaccination and 2 weeks post-vaccination (recalled).

resultsA total of 54 child-parent dyads were screened, with 41 included (10/group, except PMR [n = 11]). The interventions were not always completed as intended: 10%-22% of participants received complete interventions and two had adverse events related to protocol breach. Preliminary within-group analyses showed no effects on child/parent pain ratings. However, children in DA + PMR had reduced recalled fear (p = 0.008), and PMR (p = 0.025) and DA + PMR (p = 0.003) had reduced fear of future needles. Parent ratings of child fear were also reduced immediately post-vaccination for UC (p = 0.035) and PMR (p = 0.035).

conclusionsThe interventions were feasible, although enhanced nurse training is required to improve fidelity. Preliminary clinical results appear promising, particularly for reducing needle-related fear. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: Protocol number ACTRN12618000687291 at ANZCTR.org.au SIGNIFICANCE: Two new nurse-led interventions to reduce negative impacts of vaccinations in children, divided attention and positive memory reframing, were feasible and may reduce needle-related fear. Nurses were able to deliver the interventions in various environments including non-clinical settings (schools). These interventions have potential to facilitate broader dissemination of vaccinations for children in a manner that minimizes distress.

Indexed as

NeedlesPainAdultAttentionFearFeasibility StudiesHumans

Identifiers

PMID35671133
PMCPMC11497240
OpenAlexW4281606274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.