Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35670996›Full record

ArticleTranslational stroke research2023

Machine Learning-Based Identification of Target Groups for Thrombectomy in Acute Stroke.

Fanny Quandt, Fabian Flottmann, Vince I Madai, Anna Alegiani, Clemens Küpper, Lars Kellert, Adam Hilbert, Dietmar Frey, Thomas Liebig, Jens Fiehler and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational stroke research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Fanny QuandtDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Fabian FlottmannDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Vince I MadaiCharité Lab for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine-CLAIM, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Anna AlegianiDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Clemens KüpperDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Lars KellertDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Adam HilbertCharité Lab for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine-CLAIM, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Dietmar FreyCharité Lab for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine-CLAIM, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Thomas LiebigInstitute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jens FiehlerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Mayank GoyalDepartment of Radiology, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Jeffrey L SaverDepartment of Neurology and Comprehensive Stroke Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Christian GerloffDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Götz ThomallaDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Steffen TiedtInstitute for Stroke and Dementia Research, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Feodor-Lynen-Straße 17, 81377, Munich, Germany. steffen.tiedt@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-8817-8457
GSR investigators and the VISTA-Endovascular Collaborators
LMU Klinikum · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEBirmingham City University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whether endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) improves functional outcome in patients with large-vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke that do not comply with inclusion criteria of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) but that are considered for EVT in clinical practice is uncertain. We aimed to systematically identify patients with LVO stroke underrepresented in RCTs who might benefit from EVT. Following the premises that (i) patients without reperfusion after EVT represent a non-treated control group and (ii) the level of reperfusion affects outcome in patients with benefit from EVT but not in patients without treatment benefit, we systematically assessed the importance of reperfusion level on functional outcome prediction using machine learning in patients with LVO stroke treated with EVT in clinical practice (N = 5235, German-Stroke-Registry) and in patients treated with EVT or best medical management from RCTs (N = 1488, Virtual-International-Stroke-Trials-Archive). The importance of reperfusion level on outcome prediction in an RCT-like real-world cohort equaled the importance of EVT treatment allocation for outcome prediction in RCT data and was higher compared to an unselected real-world population. The importance of reperfusion level was magnified in patient groups underrepresented in RCTs, including patients with lower NIHSS scores (0-10), M2 occlusions, and lower ASPECTS (0-5 and 6-8). Reperfusion level was equally important in patients with vertebrobasilar as with anterior LVO stroke. The importance of reperfusion level for outcome prediction identifies patient target groups who likely benefit from EVT, including vertebrobasilar stroke patients and among patients underrepresented in RCT patients with low NIHSS scores, low ASPECTS, and M2 occlusions.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaEndovascular ProceduresIschemic StrokeStrokeHumansThrombectomyThrombolytic TherapyTreatment OutcomeEndovascular thrombectomyMachine learningOutcome predictionReal-world dataStroke

Identifiers

PMID35670996
PMCPMC10159968
OpenAlexW4281844823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.