Observational studyJapanese journal of ophthalmology2022
Clinical performance of a custom-designed soft contact lens in patients with keratoconus and intolerance to rigid contact lenses.
Observational study in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trends in the Management of Keratoconus in Australia.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Article
- Effects of Custom-Designed Soft Contact Lenses on Irregular Astigmatism Correction in Patients with Keratoconus.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study evaluated the efficacy and safety of YOUSOFT STUDY
designRetrospective observational study.
methodsThirty-six eyes of 20 patients (14 men and 6 women) with keratoconus and rigid CL intolerance were included in the study. Four patients were unilateral. The mean age was 33.1 ± 11.7 (± standard deviation) years, the mean spherical refractive error was - 4.99 ± 3.97 D, and the mean cylindrical refractive error was - 3.39 ± 2.13 D. The following examinations were performed at baseline and were repeated at every visit; refractometry, visual acuity, corneal topography and pachymetry with an anterior OCT system. Corneal endothelial cell density was evaluated at baseline and every 6 months. Slit-lamp examination was also performed to confirm the CL condition and ocular health at every visit.
resultsSeventeen patients (85%) were able to continue using the Yousoft. Among 3 patients (15%) who dropped out, 2 were dissatisfied with their visual outcomes and one had trouble with lens handling. Uncorrected visual acuity was 1.08 ± 0.43 (range: 0.22 to 2.00) logMAR at baseline, and best CL-corrected visual acuity was 0.01 ± 0.15 (range: - 0.18 to 0.40) logMAR, showing a significant improvement after wearing Yousoft (P < 0.0001). The endothelial cell density did not change significantly, with 2373 ± 482 at baseline and 2402 ± 464 cells/mm
conclusionsThis study showed the efficacy and acceptable safety of Yousoft for patients with keratoconus and intolerance to rigid CLs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.