SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2022
Exploring heterogeneities of cardiovascular efficacy and effectiveness of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes: an umbrella review of evidence from randomized clinical trials versus real-world observational studies.
Synthesis in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor use in type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with a lower rate of atrial arrhythmias in a hospitalized real-world population.Heart rhythm O2 · 2025Article
- Diabetes and Stroke: Impact of Novel Therapies for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Cost-Effectiveness of SGLT2 Inhibitors in a Real-World Population: A MICADO Model-Based Analysis Using Routine Data from a GP Registry.PharmacoEconomics · 2023Article
- Does evidence from RCTs suggest: SGLT2 inhibitors could not reduce myocardial infarction and stroke?European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Article
- Reply to Lixin Du et al.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe aimed to explore possible contributors to discrepancies between randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world observational studies (OS) in cardiovascular benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients.
methodsWe searched PubMed and EMBASE to identify meta-analyses of RCTs and OS on cardiovascular effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in T2D patients. Cardiovascular outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, cardiovascular mortality (CVM), all-cause mortality (ACM), hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), and atrial fibrillation (AF). We examined the summary relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each endpoint from meta-analyses of RCTs.
resultsWe identified and included 15 eligible meta-analyses, 13 for RCTs and 2 for OS, with moderately strong evidence. The results revealed a significant discrepancy between RCTs and OS for MI (RR, 95% CI 1.05, 0.82-1.38; I = 91.5% versus odds ratio (OR), 95% CI 0.77, 0.73-0.81; I = 15.0%), stroke (RR, 95% CI 0.99, 0.76-1.29; I = 93.4% versus OR, 95% CI 0.75, 0.72-0.78; I = 23.0%), and AF (RR, 95% CI 0.72, 0.62-0.85; I = 0.0% versus OR, 95% CI 0.92, 0.83-1.02; I = 0.0%).
conclusionOS presented significant benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors both on primary and secondary preventions of MACE, MI, stroke, ACM, CVM, and HHF; RCTs did not. Given the spectrum of T2D patient characteristics and the strength of overall evidence, our review underscored the importance of constant integration of all available information and critical interpretation of all inconsistencies to optimize evidence-based diabetes care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35670826What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.