Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35670729›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2022

Creation and evaluation of full-text literature-derived, feature-weighted disease models of genetically determined developmental disorders.

T M Yates, A Lain, J Campbell, D R FitzPatrick, T I Simpson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

T M YatesMRC Human Genetics Unit, Western General Hospital, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0118-5946
A LainInstitute for Adaptive and Neural Computation, Informatics Forum, The University of Edinburgh, 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, UK.
J CampbellMRC Human Genetics Unit, Western General Hospital, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK.
D R FitzPatrickMRC Human Genetics Unit, Western General Hospital, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK.
T I SimpsonInstitute for Adaptive and Neural Computation, Informatics Forum, The University of Edinburgh, 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0495-7187
European Bioinformatics Institute · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBWestern General Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00007/3Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 200990/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are >2500 different genetically determined developmental disorders (DD), which, as a group, show very high levels of both locus and allelic heterogeneity. This has led to the wide-spread use of evidence-based filtering of genome-wide sequence data as a diagnostic tool in DD. Determining whether the association of a filtered variant at a specific locus is a plausible explanation of the phenotype in the proband is crucial and commonly requires extensive manual literature review by both clinical scientists and clinicians. Access to a database of weighted clinical features extracted from rigorously curated literature would increase the efficiency of this process and facilitate the development of robust phenotypic similarity metrics. However, given the large and rapidly increasing volume of published information, conventional biocuration approaches are becoming impractical. Here, we present a scalable, automated method for the extraction of categorical phenotypic descriptors from the full-text literature. Papers identified through literature review were downloaded and parsed using the Cadmus custom retrieval package. Human Phenotype Ontology terms were extracted using MetaMap, with 76-84% precision and 65-73% recall. Mean terms per paper increased from 9 in title + abstract, to 68 using full text. We demonstrate that these literature-derived disease models plausibly reflect true disease expressivity more accurately than widely used manually curated models, through comparison with prospectively gathered data from the Deciphering Developmental Disorders study. The area under the curve for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves increased by 5-10% through the use of literature-derived models. This work shows that scalable automated literature curation increases performance and adds weight to the need for this strategy to be integrated into informatic variant analysis pipelines. Database URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baac038.

Indexed as

Developmental DisabilitiesPublicationsChildDatabases, FactualData MiningHumansROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID35670729
PMCPMC9216525
OpenAlexW4282939276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.