ArticleCancer immunology research2022
All Glioblastoma Are Not Equal: Distinct Spatial Immune Profiles Between De Novo and Recurrent Tumors.
Article in Cancer immunology research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lack of insight into the immunosuppressive microenvironment of glioblastoma (GBM) hinders successful application of immunotherapy. In this issue, Alanio and colleagues identify a distinct T-cell localization profile between recurrent and de novo GBM highlighting the importance of spatial heterogeneity and providing new avenues to explore to improve GBM outcome. See related article by Alanio et al., p. 800 (3).
Indexed as
Identifiers
35670711What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.