Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35670414›Full record

Trial reportWomen's health (London, England)

Single-dose versus multiple-dose antibiotics prophylaxis for preventing caesarean section postpartum infections: A randomized controlled trial.

Gerald Tochukwu Igwemadu, George Uchenna Eleje, Enang Enang Eno, Uche Augustine Akunaeziri, Folashade Adeola Afolabi, Abayomi Ibukun Alao, Onazi Ochima

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Predictive Nomogram for Post-Cesarean Infections: Risk Factors and Clinical Implications.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Antibiotics for preventing infection at the surgical site: Single dose vs. multiple doses.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gerald Tochukwu IgwemaduDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Federal Medical Centre, Keffi, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0003-0180-0432
George Uchenna ElejeEffective Care Research Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-0390-2152
Enang Enang EnoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Federal Medical Centre, Keffi, Nigeria.
Uche Augustine AkunaeziriDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Federal Medical Centre, Keffi, Nigeria.
Folashade Adeola AfolabiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Federal Medical Centre, Keffi, Nigeria.
Abayomi Ibukun AlaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Federal Medical Centre, Keffi, Nigeria.
Onazi OchimaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Federal Medical Centre, Keffi, Nigeria.
Federal Medical Centre · NGNnamdi Azikiwe University · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCaesarean section, a common obstetric surgical procedure, is a major predisposing factor for puerperal infections, requiring the need for antibiotic prophylaxis. Evidence suggests that single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis has comparable efficacy to multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis, but with a lower cost and risk of antibiotic resistance. However, single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis after caesarean section is not generally used in many centres in sub-Saharan Africa.

objectiveThis study aimed to compare the effectiveness of single- versus multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent post-caesarean section infections. METHODOLOGY: This open-label, randomized controlled trial involved 162 consenting patients admitted for caesarean section (elective or emergency) at the Federal Medical Centre Keffi. They were distributed randomly into treatment arm A or B. Subjects in both arms received intravenous ceftriaxone (1 g) and metronidazole (500 mg) 30-60 min before incision; subjects in arm B received additional parenteral doses for 48 h and then cefuroxime 500 mg tablets every 12 h and metronidazole 400 mg tablets every 8 h for 5 days. The patients were monitored for 2 weeks for evidence of wound infection, febrile morbidity and clinical endometritis.

resultThere was no statistical difference in the incidence of wound infection (6.6% versus 7.4%;

conclusionSingle-dose ceftriaxone and metronidazole is as effective as multiple doses for antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent post-caesarean section infections. Adoption of this approach in low-risk patients would reduce the cost of prophylactic antibiotics, workload for staff and antibiotic resistance.

Indexed as

EndometritisPuerperal InfectionAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisCeftriaxoneCesarean SectionFemaleHumansMetronidazolePostpartum PeriodPregnancySurgical Wound InfectionAnti-Bacterial AgentsCeftriaxoneMetronidazoleantibiotics prophylaxiscaesarean sectionpostoperativewound infections

Identifiers

PMID35670414
PMCPMC9178729
OpenAlexW4282932730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.