Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35669922›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

The Impact of Telemedicine on Rheumatology Care.

Wei Tang, Sean Inzerillo, Julia Weiner, Leila Khalili, Julia Barasch, Yevgeniya Gartshteyn, Maria Dall'Era, Cynthia Aranow, Meggan Mackay, Anca Askanase

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Wei TangDivision of Rheumatology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Sean InzerilloDivision of Rheumatology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Julia WeinerDivision of Rheumatology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Leila KhaliliDivision of Rheumatology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Julia BaraschColumbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States.
Yevgeniya GartshteynDivision of Rheumatology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Maria Dall'EraLupus Clinic and Rheumatology Clinical Research Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Cynthia AranowFeinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, United States.
Meggan MackayFeinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, United States.
Anca AskanaseDivision of Rheumatology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USFeinstein Institute for Medical Research · USColumbia University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The pandemic disrupted the care of patients with rheumatic diseases; difficulties in access to care and its psychological impact affected quality of life. Telemedicine as an alternative to traditional face-to-face office visits has the potential to mitigate this impact. Objective: To evaluate patient and provider experience with telemedicine and its effect on care. Methods: We surveyed patients with rheumatic diseases and their rheumatology providers. The surveys were conducted in 2020 and repeated in 2021. We assessed data on quality of care and health-related quality of life. Results: Hundred patients and 17 providers responded to the survey. Patients reported higher satisfaction with telemedicine in 2021 compared to 2020 (94 vs. 84%), felt more comfortable with (96 vs. 86%), expressed a stronger preference for (22 vs. 16%), and higher intention to use telemedicine in the future (83 vs. 77%); patients thought physicians were able to address their concerns. While providers' satisfaction with telemedicine increased (18-76%), 14/17 providers believed that telemedicine visits were worse than in-person visits. There were no differences in annualized office visits and admissions. Mean EQ-5D score was 0.74, lower than general population (0.87) but equivalent to a subset of patients with SLE (0.74). Conclusion: Our data showed a high level of satisfaction with telemedicine. The lower rheumatology provider satisfaction raises concern if telemedicine constitutes an acceptable alternative to in-person care. The stable number of office visits, admissions, and the similar quality of life to pre-pandemic level suggest effective management of rheumatic diseases using telemedicine/in-person hybrid care.

Indexed as

autoimmune diseases (AD)quality of care/care deliveryquality of lifesurveytelemedicinetelerheumatology

Identifiers

PMID35669922
PMCPMC9163385
OpenAlexW4280582507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.