Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35669886›Full record

ArticleClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2022

Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact of Comprehensive Anemia Management, The First Pillar of Patient Blood Management, on the Turkish Healthcare System.

Mehtap Tatar, Neslihan Alkış, Çiğdem Yıldırım Güçlü, Onat Bermede, Bülent Erdemli, Serdar Günaydın

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mehtap TatarPolar Health Economics and Policy, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-9189-9178
Neslihan AlkışDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Çiğdem Yıldırım GüçlüDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-8416-3418
Onat BermedeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-8598-6264
Bülent ErdemliDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Serdar GünaydınDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Ankara City Hospital Campus, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9717-9793
Ankara University · TRSağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Patient blood management (PBM) is a patient-centered, evidence-based, multidisciplinary approach aimed at optimizing hemoglobin concentration, ensuring the continuity of hemostasis and minimizing blood loss in patients undergoing surgery. The aims of this study were: (1) to explore the cost-effectiveness of comprehensive anemia management, the first pillar of PBM, in non-cardiac and cardiac surgery from the Turkish Social Security Institution's (SSI's) perspective; and (2) to explore the potential budget impact of PBM for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and hip and knee arthroplasty to the SSI. Methods: Cost-effectiveness and budget impact models were developed based on the avoided postoperative adverse events following implementation of the first pillar of PBM for non-cardiac and cardiac surgical patients. The probabilities of adverse events (sepsis with and without pneumonia, renal failure, myocardial infarction and stroke) were taken from a recent meta-analysis and the costs of treating these adverse events to the SSI were estimated through expert views and the use of SSI guidelines. Results: The PBM arm dominated the control arm for both non-cardiac and cardiac surgeries in terms of cost-effectiveness in the simulated cohort of patients and was associated with improved outcomes and lower costs (1768 and 1244 avoided adverse events, and incremental cost reductions for non-cardiac and cardiac surgery of 7504 Turkish lira [TRY] and 6102 TRY, respectively). The budget impact analysis showed that PBM is a potential cost-saving option for the SSI, with savings of up to 196,937,705 TRY (€12,841,697) for hip and knee arthroplasty and 24,642,504 TRY (€1,606,861) for CABG surgery. Conclusion: PBM is a cost-effective option with a potential of cost-saving for cardiac and non-cardiac surgery in Turkey.

Indexed as

budget impactcost-effectiveness analysispatient blood managementTurkey; Turkish healthcare system

Identifiers

PMID35669886
PMCPMC9166278
OpenAlexW4281765783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.