Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35669711›Full record

ArticleHorticulture research2022

Genomic prediction of morphometric and colorimetric traits in Solanaceous fruits.

Hao Tong, Amol N Nankar, Jintao Liu, Velichka Todorova, Daniela Ganeva, Stanislava Grozeva, Ivanka Tringovska, Gancho Pasev, Vesela Radeva-Ivanova, Tsanko Gechev and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Horticulture research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Phenotypic simulation for fruit-related traits in FMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2025
    Article
  2. Genomic selection for crop improvement in fruits and vegetables: a systematic scoping review.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hao TongCenter of Plant Systems Biology and Biotechnology, Plovdiv, 4000, Bulgaria.
Amol N NankarCenter of Plant Systems Biology and Biotechnology, Plovdiv, 4000, Bulgaria.
Jintao LiuSystems Biology and Mathematical Modeling, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam, 14476, Germany.
Velichka TodorovaMaritsa Vegetable Crops Research Institute, Plovdiv, 4003, Bulgaria.
Daniela GanevaMaritsa Vegetable Crops Research Institute, Plovdiv, 4003, Bulgaria.
Stanislava GrozevaMaritsa Vegetable Crops Research Institute, Plovdiv, 4003, Bulgaria.
Ivanka TringovskaMaritsa Vegetable Crops Research Institute, Plovdiv, 4003, Bulgaria.
Gancho PasevMaritsa Vegetable Crops Research Institute, Plovdiv, 4003, Bulgaria.
Vesela Radeva-IvanovaMaritsa Vegetable Crops Research Institute, Plovdiv, 4003, Bulgaria.
Tsanko GechevCenter of Plant Systems Biology and Biotechnology, Plovdiv, 4000, Bulgaria.
Dimitrina KostovaCenter of Plant Systems Biology and Biotechnology, Plovdiv, 4000, Bulgaria.
Zoran NikoloskiCenter of Plant Systems Biology and Biotechnology, Plovdiv, 4000, Bulgaria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selection of high-performance lines with respect to traits of interest is a key step in plant breeding. Genomic prediction allows to determine the genomic estimated breeding values of unseen lines for trait of interest using genetic markers, e.g. single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and machine learning approaches, which can therefore shorten breeding cycles, referring to genomic selection (GS). Here, we applied GS approaches in two populations of Solanaceous crops, i.e. tomato and pepper, to predict morphometric and colorimetric traits. The traits were measured by using scoring-based conventional descriptors (CDs) as well as by Tomato Analyzer (TA) tool using the longitudinally and latitudinally cut fruit images. The GS performance was assessed in cross-validations of classification-based and regression-based machine learning models for CD and TA traits, respectively. The results showed the usage of TA traits and tag SNPs provide a powerful combination to predict morphology and color-related traits of Solanaceous fruits. The highest predictability of 0.89 was achieved for fruit width in pepper, with an average predictability of 0.69 over all traits. The multi-trait GS models are of slightly better predictability than single-trait models for some colorimetric traits in pepper. While model validation performs poorly on wild tomato accessions, the usage as many as one accession per wild species in the training set can increase the transferability of models to unseen populations for some traits (e.g. fruit shape for which predictability in unseen scenario increased from zero to 0.6). Overall, GS approaches can assist the selection of high-performance Solanaceous fruits in crop breeding.

Identifiers

PMID35669711
PMCPMC9157653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.