Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35669700›Full record

ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2022

A cross-sectional investigation of the impact of COVID-19 on community pharmacy.

Amin Gicic, Shiyi Li, Shabnam Amini, Tin Fei Sim, Christianne White, Bruce Sunderland, Petra Czarniak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Osteoporosis screening in Australian community pharmacies: A mixed methods study.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amin GicicCurtin Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth 6102, Bentley, Australia.
Shiyi LiCurtin Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth 6102, Bentley, Australia.
Shabnam AminiCurtin Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth 6102, Bentley, Australia.
Tin Fei SimCurtin Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth 6102, Bentley, Australia.
Christianne WhiteSchool of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Perth 6009, Australia.
Bruce SunderlandCurtin Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth 6102, Bentley, Australia.
Petra CzarniakCurtin Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth 6102, Bentley, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 caused Australian government and state legislative/regulatory changes which impacted directly on aspects of professional community pharmacy. Objectives: To examine the views and experiences of community pharmacists regarding the impact of COVID-19 on professional pharmacy services in Western Australian community pharmacies. Methods: A Qualtrics questionnaire link was emailed to all 668 community pharmacies in Western Australia in March 2021. Data were collected on the impact of COVID-19 on professional pharmacy services (telehealth, digital image prescriptions, continued dispensing and emergency supply, home delivery services, medicine and medical resource substitutions), the pharmacy environment (work hours) and professional pharmacy structure (staffing and any measures implemented). Questions included 5-point Likert responses as well as yes/no or option responses. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise questionnaire responses. Chi Squared analysis was used to investigate differences between metropolitan and rural community pharmacies. Results: The response rate was 97/668 (14.5%). Many pharmacies belonged to banner groups (47/95; 40.5%). Use of telehealth was reported (25/96; 26.0%), most commonly for MedsChecks. Many received digital image prescriptions (83/88; 94.3%) and continued dispensing, emergency supply requests, or both (78/84; 92.9%) daily. For home deliveries, most used pharmacy staff (56/78; 71.8%). Shortages were reported for many medicines. Panic buying/stock-piling and the media contributed to increased panic and shortages. Little change occurred in trading hours although many reported increased workloads (67/75; 89.3%). Conclusions: Covid-19 has fast-tracked digitisation in Western Australian community pharmacies. This change is likely similar in other parts of Australia. This was facilitated through the expedition of regulatory changes to enable digital health. Whilst electronic prescribing has progressed, telehealth in pharmacy remained underutilised. The pandemic has contributed to pronounced medicine and medical resources shortages, which increased the workloads and pressure of community pharmacists. Pharmacists were confronted with a lot of legislative change in a short period of time. There is a need for clear and concise communication from all levels of government in future pandemics.

Indexed as

Community pharmacyCOVID-19 pandemicLegislative/ regulatory changesPharmacy environmentPharmacy structureProfessional pharmacy services

Identifiers

PMID35669700
PMCPMC9159746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.