Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35669699›Full record

ArticleAdvances in orthopedics2022

Kinematic and Radiographic Evaluation of Acromioclavicular Reconstruction with a Synthetic Ligament.

Rafael F Escamilla, Chad Poage, Scott Brotherton, Toran D MacLeod, Charles Leddon, James R Andrews

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in orthopedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rafael F EscamillaDepartment of Physical Therapy, California State University, Sacramento, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2558-122X
Chad PoageAndrews Institute for Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine, Gulf Breeze, FL, USA.
Scott BrothertonOrthopedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Palm Harbor, FL, USA.
Toran D MacLeodDepartment of Physical Therapy, California State University, Sacramento, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1158-713X
Charles LeddonAndrews Research and Education Foundation, Gulf Breeze, FL, USA.
James R AndrewsAndrews Research and Education Foundation, Gulf Breeze, FL, USA.
Andrews Institute for Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine · USAndrews Research & Education Foundation · USCalifornia State University, Sacramento · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The optimal surgical technique for unstable acromioclavicular (AC) and coracoclavicular (CC) joint injuries has not yet been established. The biomechanical and radiographic effect of the LockDown device, a synthetic ligament for AC joint reconstruction, was evaluated to assess the optimal surgical technique for unstable AC and CC joint injuries. It was hypothesized that the LockDown device would restore AC joint kinematics and radiographic stability to near native values. Methods: Three fresh frozen cadaveric torsos (6 shoulders) modelled CC joint motion in their "native," "severed," and "reconstructed" states. The effects of stressed and unstressed native, severed, and reconstructed conditions on AC separation and CC distances in anteroposterior, mediolateral, and inferosuperior directions during shoulder abduction, flexion, and scaption were assessed. The analysis of variance ( Results: From radiographic analyses, the CC distance was significantly greater ( Conclusion: Reconstruction of AC joint with LockDown synthetic ligament restores motion of clavicle and acromion to near native values, thereby decreasing scapular dyskinesis and enhancing AC joint stability.

Identifiers

PMID35669699
PMCPMC9167124
OpenAlexW4281987824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.