Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35669648›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

English Education Tutoring Teaching System Based on MOOC.

Wang Mi

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Retracted: English Education Tutoring Teaching System Based on MOOC.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Retraction · 2023-07-19Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/0488A9237ADDC222BA92AF04D22289
  • Retracted
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Wang MiZhejiang Industry and Trade Vocational College, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8881-4225

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the process of continuous reform and development of education and teaching, some traditional teaching modes are gradually eliminated, whereas new teaching modes are gradually recognized by teachers and students. These modes are widely used in education and teaching due to their overwhelming characteristics. Among these emerging teaching modes, massive open online course (MOOC) is a relatively advanced teaching mode with a better application effect. Quickly and accurately detecting the cheating behavior of MOOC learners is of great significance for maintaining the development of the MOOC platform and English education counseling. This paper studies a deep-learning-based hybrid model for MOOC cheating detection. The model greatly improves the detection performance of a single model by integrating CNN, a bidirectional gated recurrent unit, and an attention mechanism. The proposed model selects the English learning behavior data of a MOOC platform to verify the performance of the algorithm. Simulation results show that the proposed scheme can greatly help MOOC-based English education tutoring.

Indexed as

Education, DistanceAlgorithmsHumansLearningStudents

Identifiers

PMID35669648
PMCPMC9167017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.