ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
Genetic Algorithm in Multimedia Dynamic Prediction of Groundwater in Open-Pit Mine.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study is aiming at the nonlinear mapping relationship between the groundwater level and its influencing factors. Through the design and calculation process of matlab7 platform, taking the monitoring wells distributed in an open-pit mining area as an example, the short-term prediction of groundwater dynamics in the study area is carried out by using BP neural network model and BP neural network model based on genetic algorithm. Root mean squared error (RMSE), Mean absolute percent-age error (MAPE) and Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) are used coefficients,, and the results were compared with BP neural network and stepwise regression model. From the results of the comparative analysis, the genetic algorithm optimized the BP neural network model in the training phase and the test phase, the RMSE was 0.25 and 0.36, the MAPE was 6.7 and 8.13%, and the NSE was 0.87 and 0.72, respectively. The BP neural network model optimized by genetic algorithm is obviously superior to the BP neural network model, which is an ideal prediction model for short-term groundwater level. This model can provide a prediction method for groundwater dynamic prediction and has a good application prospect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.