Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35669622›Full record

ArticleJournal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty2022

Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Component Size Prediction with 3-Dimensional Pre-Operative Digital Planning.

Michael T Freehill, Jack W Weick, Brent A Ponce, Asheesh Bedi, Derek Haas, Bethany Ruffino, Chris Robbins, Alexander M Prete, John G Costouros, Jon Jp Warner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neurologic Complications in Shoulder Surgery: Anatomy, Mechanisms, and Surgical Recommendations.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michael T FreehillDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Jack W WeickDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3344-4727
Brent A PonceDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Asheesh BediDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Derek HaasAvant-Garde Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Bethany RuffinoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Chris RobbinsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Alexander M PreteDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
John G CostourosInstitute for Joint Restoration and Research, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Jon Jp WarnerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The rate, complexity, and cost of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) continues to grow. Technology has advanced pre-operative templating. Reducing cost of TSA has positive impact for the patient, manufacturer, and hospital. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of implant size selection based on 3-D templating. Our hypothesis was that pre-operative templating would enable accurate implant prediction within one size. Methods: Multicenter retrospective study of anatomic TSAs templated utilizing 3-D virtual planning technology. This program uses computed tomography (CT) scans allowing the surgeon to predict component sizes of the glenoid and humeral head and stem. Pre-operative templated implant size were compared to actual implant size at the time of surgery. Primary data analysis utilized unweighted Cohen's Kappa test. Results: 111 TSAs were analyzed from five surgeons. Pre-operative templated glenoid sizes were within one size of actual implant in 99% and exactly matched in 89%. For patients requiring a posterior glenoid augment (n = 14), 100% of implants were within one size of the template and 93% matched exactly. For stemless humeral components (n = 87) implanted, 98% matched the pre-operative template within one size with 79% exactly matched. For stemmed components (n = 24), 88% of cases were within one size of the preoperative plan and exactly matching in 83%. Humeral head diameter matched within one size of the pre-operative template in 84% of cases and exactly matched in 72%. Conclusion: Pre-operative 3-D templating for TSAs can accurately predict glenoid and humeral component size. This study sets the groundwork for utilization of pre-operative 3-D templating as a potential method to reduce overall TSA costs by managing cost of implants, reducing inventory needs, and improving surgical efficiency.

Indexed as

Arthroplastyprosthesisreplacementshoulder

Identifiers

PMID35669622
PMCPMC9163733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.