Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35669452›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neural circuits2022

Toward a Unified Analysis of the Brain Criticality Hypothesis: Reviewing Several Available Tools.

Chaojun Yu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Chaojun YuSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of the brain criticality hypothesis has been going on for about 20 years, various models and methods have been developed for probing this field, together with large amounts of controversial experimental findings. However, no standardized protocol of analysis has been established so far. Therefore, hoping to make some contributions to standardization of such analysis, we review several available tools used for estimating the criticality of the brain in this paper.

Indexed as

BrainModels, Neurologicalbrain criticalitybranching rationeuronal avalanchepower-lawscaling relationstandardizationstatistical tests

Identifiers

PMID35669452
PMCPMC9164306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.