Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35669292›Full record

ArticleRadiation measurements2021

Consistency checks of results from a Monte Carlo code intercomparison for emitted electron spectra and energy deposition around a single gold nanoparticle irradiated by X-rays.

H Rabus, W B Li, H Nettelbeck, J Schuemann, C Villagrasa, M Beuve, S Di Maria, B Heide, A P Klapproth, F Poignant and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation measurements, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

H RabusPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Braunschweig and Berlin, Germany.
W B LiInstitute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
H NettelbeckPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Braunschweig and Berlin, Germany.
J SchuemannMassachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, MA, USA.
C VillagrasaInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-Aux-Roses, France.
M BeuveInstitut de Physique des 2 Infinis, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.
S Di MariaCentro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Bobadela LRS, Portugal.
B HeideKarlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.
A P KlapprothInstitute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
F PoignantInstitut de Physique des 2 Infinis, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.
R QiuDepartment of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
B RudekMassachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard University · USPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt · DEUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRHelmholtz Zentrum München · DEInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire · FRKarlsruhe Institute of Technology · DETsinghua University · CNTUM Klinikum · DEUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

TOPAS - nBio, a Monte Carlo tool for radiation biology researchR01CA187003 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SCHUEMANN, JAN PATRICK OSCAR · 2015 to 2024
$4.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA187003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organized by the European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS), a Monte Carlo code intercomparison exercise was conducted where participants simulated the emitted electron spectra and energy deposition around a single gold nanoparticle (GNP) irradiated by X-rays. In the exercise, the participants scored energy imparted in concentric spherical shells around a spherical volume filled with gold or water as well as the spectral distribution of electrons leaving the GNP. Initially, only the ratio of energy deposition with and without GNP was to be reported. During the evaluation of the exercise, however, the data for energy deposition in the presence and absence of the GNP were also requested. A GNP size of 50 nm and 100 nm diameter was considered as well as two different X-ray spectra (50 kVp and 100kVp). This introduced a redundancy that can be used to cross-validate the internal consistency of the simulation results. In this work, evaluation of the reported results is presented in terms of integral quantities that can be benchmarked against values obtained from physical properties of the radiation spectra and materials involved. The impact of different interaction cross-section datasets and their implementation in the different Monte Carlo codes is also discussed.

Identifiers

PMID35669292
PMCPMC9165644
OpenAlexW3183932792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.