ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2022
Factors affecting the assessment of cancer cachexia by nurses caring for patients with advanced cancer undergoing chemotherapy: A cross-sectional survey.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Educational program on cancer cachexia for nurses: a pilot randomized controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Addressing gaps in cancer cachexia care among healthcare professionals at Uganda Cancer Institute.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Correlation between cancer cachexia and psychosocial impact in older patients with advanced lung cancer undergoing chemotherapy.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
- Holistic multimodal care for patients with cancer cachexia and their family caregivers.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2023Review
- The role of pharmacists in multimodal cancer cachexia care.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2023Review
- The Incidence and Management of Cancer-Related Anorexia During Treatment with Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.Cancer management and research · 2023Review
- Perspectives of Health Care Professionals on Multimodal Interventions for Cancer Cachexia.Palliative medicine reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to identify the awareness, knowledge, and assessment of cancer cachexia among nurses who cared for patients with advanced cancer undergoing chemotherapy. In addition, we identified the factors that affected their assessments. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among nurses who cared for patients with advanced cancer undergoing chemotherapy at designated cancer care hospitals and regional cancer care cooperation hospitals between June and September 2020. We applied Bandura's triadic reciprocal causation as the research framework. The questionnaire consisted of questions on awareness, knowledge, and assessment of cancer cachexia. Single and multiple regression analyses were conducted on the relationship between each variable and the number of assessment items. Results: Questionnaires were sent to 1026 nurses, 403 of whom responded (response rate: 39.3%). Among these, 299 responses were valid, being a 74.1% valid response rate. The average age was 39.74 ± 9.65 years and the mean work experience as a nurse was 16.50 ± 9.14 years. In respect of the awareness of cancer cachexia, 93.3% of the participants answered "assessment of cancer cachexia was needed," and 75.2% answered "a nurse's role includes assessing for cancer cachexia." Only 15.4% responded positively regarding "confidence in the assessment of cancer cachexia." Regarding knowledge of cancer cachexia, the percentage of correct answers to questions about the definition of cachexia and diagnostic criteria ranged from 45.5% to 53.8%. With regard to cancer cachexia assessments, the participants assessed "weight loss or rate of weight loss (56.9%)," "symptoms affecting nutritional status (54.2%)," and "anorexia (46.2%)." Factors affecting the assessment of cancer cachexia were higher knowledge scores on cancer cachexia ( Conclusions: Nurses held the view that their role required them to assess for cancer cachexia, but they did not feel confident in doing so. In addition, they lacked knowledge of reversible "cancer cachexia;" hence, the assessments were not routinely completed. Education on these topics and the development and standardization of tools to assess or collaborate with other professions are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.