Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35669286›Full record

ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2022

Factors affecting the assessment of cancer cachexia by nurses caring for patients with advanced cancer undergoing chemotherapy: A cross-sectional survey.

Rika Sato, Naoko Hayashi, Naoko Nakayama, Aiko Okimura

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The role of pharmacists in multimodal cancer cachexia care.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rika SatoGraduate School of Nursing Science, St Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Naoko HayashiGraduate School of Nursing Science, St Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Naoko NakayamaKanagawa University of Human Services, Kanagawa, Japan.
Aiko OkimuraGraduate School of Nursing Science, St Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
St. Luke's International University · JPKanagawa University of Human Services · JPShizuoka Cancer Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to identify the awareness, knowledge, and assessment of cancer cachexia among nurses who cared for patients with advanced cancer undergoing chemotherapy. In addition, we identified the factors that affected their assessments. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among nurses who cared for patients with advanced cancer undergoing chemotherapy at designated cancer care hospitals and regional cancer care cooperation hospitals between June and September 2020. We applied Bandura's triadic reciprocal causation as the research framework. The questionnaire consisted of questions on awareness, knowledge, and assessment of cancer cachexia. Single and multiple regression analyses were conducted on the relationship between each variable and the number of assessment items. Results: Questionnaires were sent to 1026 nurses, 403 of whom responded (response rate: 39.3%). Among these, 299 responses were valid, being a 74.1% valid response rate. The average age was 39.74 ​± ​9.65 years and the mean work experience as a nurse was 16.50 ​± ​9.14 years. In respect of the awareness of cancer cachexia, 93.3% of the participants answered "assessment of cancer cachexia was needed," and 75.2% answered "a nurse's role includes assessing for cancer cachexia." Only 15.4% responded positively regarding "confidence in the assessment of cancer cachexia." Regarding knowledge of cancer cachexia, the percentage of correct answers to questions about the definition of cachexia and diagnostic criteria ranged from 45.5% to 53.8%. With regard to cancer cachexia assessments, the participants assessed "weight loss or rate of weight loss (56.9%)," "symptoms affecting nutritional status (54.2%)," and "anorexia (46.2%)." Factors affecting the assessment of cancer cachexia were higher knowledge scores on cancer cachexia ( Conclusions: Nurses held the view that their role required them to assess for cancer cachexia, but they did not feel confident in doing so. In addition, they lacked knowledge of reversible "cancer cachexia;" hence, the assessments were not routinely completed. Education on these topics and the development and standardization of tools to assess or collaborate with other professions are required.

Indexed as

Cancer cachexiaCancer cachexia assessmentCross-sectional surveyOncology nursingTriadic reciprocal causation

Identifiers

PMID35669286
PMCPMC9163426
OpenAlexW4224991140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.