Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35669248›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022

Clinical Data Analysis for Treatment of Adult Inguinal Hernia by TAPP or TEP.

Chunhui Cao, Xiaoyu Shi, Wei Jin, Fengming Luan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. From hands to handles: a modern duel between laparoscopic TEP and robotic TAPP.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chunhui CaoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Xiaoyu ShiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Wei JinDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Fengming LuanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair are the primary surgical methods for the treatment of adult inguinal hernia, but it remains necessary to consider which one to choose in clinical practice. Our study seeks to compare the efficacy of laparoscopic TAPP and laparoscopic TEP in the treatment of adult inguinal hernia and to explore which surgical method is a better choice. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 686 adult patients with inguinal hernia admitted to our hospital from the period January 2016 to December 2020 was conducted. According to different surgical methods, they were divided into two groups: a TAPP group ( Results: There were no significant differences in postoperative hospital stay, complications, and the recurrence rate between the two groups ( Conclusion: TAPP and TEP are safe and effective surgical methods in the treatment of adult inguinal hernia. However, compared with TAPP, TEP can significantly shorten the operative time, reduce intraoperative trauma, and limit postoperative pain in the treatment of adult inguinal hernia. Furthermore, it does not increase the rate of complications or recurrence, so it is worth popularizing.

Indexed as

inguinal hernialaparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR)surgerytotally extraperitoneal (TEP)transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP)

Identifiers

PMID35669248
PMCPMC9163490
OpenAlexW4280611669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.