Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35669211›Full record

ArticleCurrent psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)2022

Validation and psychometric properties of the Italian Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX-I) scale.

Francesco Bruno, Valentina Laganà, Rebecca Pistininzi, Francesca Tarantino, Leslie Martin, Rocco Servidio

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Francesco BrunoRegional Neurogenetic Centre (CRN), Department of Primary Care, ASP Catanzaro, Viale A. Perugini, 88046 Lamezia Terme, CZ Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1377-4489
Valentina LaganàAssociation for Neurogenetic Research (ARN), Lamezia Terme, CZ Italy.
Rebecca PistininziDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Francesca TarantinoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Leslie MartinDepartment of Psychology, La Sierra University, Riverside, CA USA.
Rocco ServidioDepartment of Cultures, Education and Society, University of Calabria, Via Pietro Bucci, Cubo 18/B - Quarto Piano, 87036 Arcavacata di Rende, Cosenza Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4587-0363
BioAge (Italy) · ITMagna Graecia University · ITLa Sierra University · USUniversity of Calabria · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the massive volume of scientific evidence on the benefits of immunisation, vaccine hesitancy is still a global health threat and represents an obstacle to controlling the spread of viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 and its associated COVID-19. Thus, the present study aimed to adapt and validate an Italian version of the Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) scale. The Italian version of the scale (VAX-I), along with validation measures (general health perceptions, perceived sensitivity to medicines, intention to get the flu vaccine, and trust in health authorities) were administered to a sample of 534 Italian participants aged 18 to 87 ( Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12144-022-03209-5.

Indexed as

COVID-19Italian validationTheory of planned behaviourThe Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) ScaleVaccination attitudesVaccination behaviourVaccination intentionVaccine hesitancyVaccine uptakeVAX-I scale

Identifiers

PMID35669211
PMCPMC9136196
OpenAlexW4281779546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.