Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35669204›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2022

Infra-Low Frequency Neurofeedback in Tension-Type Headache: A Cross-Over Sham-Controlled Study.

Galina A Arina, Olga R Dobrushina, Elizaveta T Shvetsova, Ekaterina D Osina, Georgy A Meshkov, Guzel A Aziatskaya, Alexandra K Trofimova, Inga N Efremova, Sergey E Martunov, Valentina V Nikolaeva

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Galina A ArinaFaculty of Psychology, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Olga R DobrushinaInternational Institute of Psychosomatic Health, Moscow, Russia.
Elizaveta T ShvetsovaFaculty of Psychology, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Ekaterina D OsinaFaculty of Psychology, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Georgy A MeshkovYandex LLC, Moscow, Russia.
Guzel A AziatskayaInternational Institute of Psychosomatic Health, Moscow, Russia.
Alexandra K TrofimovaFederal State Budgetary Institution "Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies" of the Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia.
Inga N EfremovaInternational Institute of Psychosomatic Health, Moscow, Russia.
Sergey E MartunovInternational Institute of Psychosomatic Health, Moscow, Russia.
Valentina V NikolaevaFaculty of Psychology, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Lomonosov Moscow State University · RUFederal Medical-Biological Agency · RUResearch Center of Neurology · RUYandex (Russia) · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary headaches are highly prevalent and represent a major cause of disability in young adults. Neurofeedback is increasingly used in the treatment of chronic pain; however, there are few studies investigating its efficacy in patients with headaches. We report the results of a cross-over sham-controlled study on the efficacy of neurofeedback in the prophylactic treatment of tension-type headache (TTH). Participants received ten sessions of infra-low frequency electroencephalographic neurofeedback and ten sessions of sham-neurofeedback, with the order of treatments being randomized. The study also included a basic psychotherapeutic intervention - a psychoeducational session performed before the main study phases and emotional support provided throughout the study period. The headache probability was modeled as a function of the neurofeedback and sham-neurofeedback sessions performed to date. As a result, we revealed a strong beneficial effect of neurofeedback and no influence of the sham sessions. The study supports the prophylactic use of infra-low frequency neurofeedback in patients with TTH. From a methodological point of view, we advocate for the explicit inclusion of psychotherapeutic components in neurofeedback study protocols.

Indexed as

endogenous neuromodulationinfra-low frequencyneurofeedbackprimary headachetension-type headache

Identifiers

PMID35669204
PMCPMC9164298
OpenAlexW4280648298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.