Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35669100›Full record

ReviewPatient related outcome measures2022

The Inclusion of Patients' Reported Outcomes to Inform Treatment Effectiveness Measures in Opioid Use Disorder. A Systematic Review.

Nitika Sanger, Balpreet Panesar, Michael Dennis, Tea Rosic, Myanca Rodrigues, Elizabeth Lovell, Shuling Yang, Mehreen Butt, Lehana Thabane, Zainab Samaan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Patient related outcome measures, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nitika Sanger *Medical Science Graduate Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Balpreet Panesar *Neuroscience Graduate Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Michael DennisMichael G DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5036-0168
Tea RosicHealth Research Methodology Graduate Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7406-4056
Myanca RodriguesHealth Research Methodology Graduate Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7953-773X
Elizabeth LovellDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Shuling YangMichael G DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Mehreen ButtAccelerated Nursing Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Lehana ThabaneHealth Research Methodology Graduate Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Zainab SamaanHealth Research Methodology Graduate Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5974-9361
McMaster University · CAPrograms for Assessment of Technology in Health Research Institute · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Patient centred care is needed now more than ever in the treatment of opioid use disorder. Trials, policy makers, and service providers have most often used treatment retention and opioid urine screens as measures of treatment effectiveness. However, patients receiving medication for opioid use disorder treatment (MOUD) may prioritise the use of different ways to assess treatment success. Objective: The aim of this review is to synthesize literature examining the self-reported goals patients would like to achieve in MOUD for opioid use disorder. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Cochrane Clinical Trials Registry, the National Institutes for Health Clinical Trials Registry, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception until April 30th, 2021. No restrictions were placed on language, age, or type of MOUD. A qualitative synthesis is presented given that a meta-analysis was not possible. Results: The search yielded a total of 21,082 records from which 8 met criteria for inclusion in the qualitative synthesis. We identified a total of 43 patient-reported treatment goals from the 8 studies. Twelve domains were created from the 43 goals reported. These domains cover a range of important areas for patients' goals related to living a normal life, physical health, mental health, treatment, and substance use specific areas. Conclusion: This review highlights several patient goals that they would like to achieve during treatment for opioid use disorder that are not commonly considered as markers of treatment effectiveness. Goals related to health, living a normal life, and overall substance use concerns by patients should be taken into consideration by clinical trialists, researchers, policy makers, service providers, patients, and communities engaged in developing and tailoring treatment plans for opioid use disorder. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42018095553.

Indexed as

medication for opioid use disorderopioid use disorderpatient-centred carepatient reported outcomes

Identifiers

PMID35669100
PMCPMC9165704
OpenAlexW4281629205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.