ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2022
Analysis of the Effect of Wound-Edge Microgranular Skin Grafting in the Treatment of Various Small Wounds.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the clinical effect of wound edge microgranular skin grafting in the treatment of various small wounds. Methods: From September 2018 to September 2021, Yueqing people's Hospital of Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province collected and recorded the data of 12 patients with chronic wounds and third degree burns. The method of skin grafting with particles at the edge of the wound was used to graft skin on the wound. Scar evaluation scale was used to evaluate the wound. The patients were followed up for 12 months. The preoperative and postoperative data, scar index and patient satisfaction after healing were recorded and statistically analyzed. Results: All patients in this group were followed up for 3-12 months, and the results showed that SCAR Scale score decreased gradually over time, with patient satisfaction ranging from 80% to 96%. The patient gradually healed, scar hyperplasia gradually improved, functional activities gradually returned to normal, clinical effect is satisfactory. Conclusion: Microparticle skin grafting at the edge of wound avoids skin grafting at different skin donor sites. It has the characteristics of simple anesthesia, small trauma and convenient operation. This method can be considered when treating patients with chronic wounds and burns who need skin grafting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.