Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35669023›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2022

High Tibial Osteotomy Versus Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty for Unicompartmental Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ishith Seth, Gabriella Bulloch, Nimish Seth, Damien Gibson, Anish Rastogi, Kirk Lower, Aaron Rodwell, Warwick Bruce

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy is a viable option in young patients with advanced arthritis in a long-term follow-up.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Article
  5. Age-stratified analysis of HTO and UKA clinical effects in cross-indicated anterior medial osteoarthritis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ishith SethIllawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW 2500 Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5444-8925
Gabriella BullochDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3004 Australia.
Nimish SethFaculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010 Australia.
Damien GibsonIllawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW 2500 Australia.
Anish RastogiIllawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW 2500 Australia.
Kirk LowerIllawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW 2500 Australia.
Aaron RodwellIllawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW 2500 Australia.
Warwick BruceSydney Local Health District, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, NSW 2139 Australia.
Wollongong Hospital · AUConcord Repatriation General Hospital · AUThe Alfred Hospital · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: High tibial osteotomy (HTO) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are commonly performed procedures for the treatment of compartmental knee osteoarthritis; however, the optimal procedure remains controversial. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the functional outcomes and assess complications and revision rates between the two techniques. Methods: We searched electronic databases for relevant studies comparing HTO versus UKA for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. Continuous data as visual analogue scale (VAS), range of motion, and free walking speed were pooled as mean differences (MDs). Dichotomous data as functional knee outcomes, complications, and revision were pooled as odds ratios (ORs), with 95% confidence interval (CI), using R software for windows. Results: Twenty-five studies involving 8185 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that HTO was associated with higher risk of complications (OR = 2.47, 95% CI [1.52, 4.04]), poorer functional results (excellent/good) (OR = 0.32, 95% CI [0.21, 0.49]), and greater range of motion (MD = 7.05, 95% CI [2.41, 11.68]) compared to UKA. No significant differences were found between the compared groups in terms of VAS (MD = 0.14, 95% CI [- 0.08, 0.36]), revision rates (OR = 1.30, 95% CI [0.65, 2.60]), and free walking speed (MD = - 0.05, 95% CI [- 0.11, 0.00]). Conclusion: This study showed that UKA achieved fewer complications, better functional outcomes, and less range of motion compared to HTO. No significant differences were detected between HTO and UKA in terms of VAS and revision rate. Treatment options should be personalized to each patient considering factors such as their age, activities of daily living, their body mass index, and severity of osteoarthritis. Level of evidence: II. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-022-00620-9.

Indexed as

Compartmental knee osteoarthritisHigh tibial osteotomyMeta-analysisUnicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID35669023
PMCPMC9123137
OpenAlexW4221092427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.