ReviewClinical and translational radiation oncology2022
The impact of para-aortic lymph node irradiation on disease-free survival in patients with cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current Paradigm and Future Directions in the Management of Nodal Disease in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.Cancers · 2025Review
- Amide proton transfer-weighted habitat radiomics: a superior approach for preoperative prediction of lymphovascular space invasion in cervical cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Comparative real-world survival outcomes of muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with bladder-only vs. whole-pelvis concurrent chemoradiation.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024Article
- Controversies in the Staging of Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Stage III C Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Radiotherapy or Radiochemotherapy.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with locally advanced cervical cancer without para-aortic lymph node metastases (PAO-LNM) at diagnosis who undergo concurrent chemoradiotherapy are at 4-11% risk of developing PAO-LNM during follow-up. Some studies suggest a beneficial influence of elective para-aortic radiotherapy (PAO-RT) on disease-free survival (DFS) in these patients. The aim of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyse literature on the impact of PAO-RT on DFS in cervical cancer patients. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed. The analysis included intervention studies that reported on DFS in patients with cervical cancer who received chemotherapy and pelvic radiotherapy with or without PAO-RT. From each included study, relevant study characteristics and outcome data including the hazard ratio (HR) adjusted for potential confounders were extracted. An overall pooled adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for DFS after PAO-RT versus no PAO-RT was calculated using a random-effects model. Results: A total of 2,016 articles were evaluated. Eleven articles were included in the systematic review, of which 3 were appropriate for quantitative meta-analysis. Pooling of these 3 cohorts (including 1,113 patients) demonstrated a statistically significant association between PAO-RT and DFS (pooled aHR 0.87, 95% confidence interval: 0.79-0.97). No significant heterogeneity among reported aHRs was observed (I Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests a modest but significant beneficial impact of elective para-aortic radiotherapy on DFS in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer who undergo concurrent chemoradiotherapy. This finding based on non-randomized studies provides an imperative for further investigation in prospective controlled trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.