ArticleRegenerative biomaterials2022
Fabrication and biological evaluation of 3D-printed calcium phosphate ceramic scaffolds with distinct macroporous geometries through digital light processing technology.
Article in Regenerative biomaterials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nanohydroxyapatite and its composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering application: a systematic review.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Creating Unidirectionally Macrochanneled Zirconia Bone Scaffolds with Elongated Microporous Frameworks via Vat Photopolymerization Using Phase-Separable, Photocurable Vehicle.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Mimicking the Osteosarcoma Bone Microenvironment Using MEW-Printed PCL Scaffolds.Macromolecular bioscience · 2026Article
- Regulation of micro-/nanotopography and porosity in biomimetic 3D-printed calcium phosphate ceramic scaffolds for enhanced bone regeneration.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- Biomimetic Nanoparticles for Bone Regeneration: Construction Strategies and Therapeutic Mechanisms.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Strategic advances in Vat Photopolymerization for 3D printing of calcium phosphate-based bone scaffolds: A review.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Calcium Phosphate Honeycomb Scaffolds with Tailored Microporous Walls Using Phase Separation-Assisted Digital Light Processing.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A novel Liesegang-patterned mineralized hydrogel drives bone regeneration with microstructure control.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- A ceramic microbridge microfluidic chip to study osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in bioactive ceramic immune microenvironment.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
- Advances in 3D printing combined with tissue engineering for nerve regeneration and repair.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Surface modification of polyetheretherketone for boosted osseointegration: A review.Biomaterials translational · 2025Review
- Advancements in nanohydroxyapatite: synthesis, biomedical applications and composite developments.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Review
- Three-Dimensionally Printed Bionic Hydroxyapatite (HAp) Ceramic Scaffolds with Different Structures and Porosities: Strength, Biocompatibility, and Biomedical Application Potential.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Personalized bioceramic grafts for craniomaxillofacial bone regeneration.International journal of oral science · 2024Review
- A Systematic Review on the Generation of Organic Structures through Additive Manufacturing Techniques.Polymers · 2024Review
- Reasoning on Pore Terminology in 3D Bioprinting.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- New insight into biodegradable macropore filler on tuning mechanical properties and bone tissue ingrowth in sparingly dissolvable bioceramic scaffolds.Materials today. Bio · 2024Article
- 3D printing materials and 3D printed surgical devices in oral and maxillofacial surgery: design, workflow and effectiveness.Regenerative biomaterials · 2024Review
- The design of strut/TPMS-based pore geometries in bioceramic scaffolds guiding osteogenesis and angiogenesis in bone regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2023Article
- Mesoporous Materials Make Hydrogels More Powerful in Biomedicine.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital light processing (DLP)-based 3D printing technique holds promise in fabricating scaffolds with high precision. Here raw calcium phosphate (CaP) powders were modified by 5.5% monoalcohol ethoxylate phosphate (MAEP) to ensure high solid loading and low viscosity. The rheological tests found that photocurable slurries composed of 50 wt% modified CaP powders and 2 wt% toners were suitable for DLP printing. Based on geometric models designed by computer-aided design (CAD) system, three printed CaP ceramics with distinct macroporous structures were prepared, including simple cube, octet-truss and inverse face-centered cube (fcc), which presented the similar phase composition and microstructure, but the different macropore geometries. Inverse fcc group showed the highest porosity and compressive strength. The
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.