ArticleEnvironmental earth sciences2022
Surface water quality in the upstream of the highly contaminated Santiago River (Mexico) during the COVID-19 lockdown.
Article in Environmental earth sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Initial Proteomic Analysis of Biogas-Related Metabolism ofMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Influence of COVID-19 lockdown on river water quality and assessment of environmental health in an industrialized belt of southern Western Ghats, India.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Santiago River (Jalisco) is a major waterway in western Mexico and has received considerable attention due to its severe pollution. Understanding the impact of reduced human activity on water quality in the Santiago River during the COVID-19 lockdown (April-May 2020) is critical for river management and restoration. However, there has been no published study in this context, presenting a significant knowledge gap. Hence, this study focuses on determining if the nationwide COVID-19 lockdown influenced or improved surface water quality in a 262-km stretch of the Santiago River upstream. Data for 15 water quality parameters collected during the lockdown were compared to levels obtained in 2019 (pre-lockdown), 2021 (unlock), and the previous eleven years (2009-2019). The values of turbidity, BOD, COD, TSS, f. coli, t. coli, nitrate, sulfate, and Pb decreased by 4-36%, while pH, EC, total nitrogen, and As increased by 0.3-21% during the lockdown compared to the pre-lockdown period, indicating a reduction in organic load in the river due to the temporary closure of industrial and commercial activities. An eleven-year comparison estimated a 0-38% decline in pH, TSS, COD, total nitrogen, sulfates, nitrates, and Pb. The unlock-period comparison showed a significant rise of 3-37% in all parameters except As, highlighting the potential repercussions of restoring activity along the Santiago River. Estimated water quality indices demonstrated short-term improvements in river water quality during the lockdown when compared to other time periods investigated. According to factor analysis, the main pollution sources influencing river water quality were untreated household sewage, industrial wastewater, and agricultural effluents. Overall, our analysis showed that the COVID-19-imposed lockdown improved the water quality of the Santiago River, laying the groundwork for local officials to identify pollution sources and better support environmental policies and water quality improvement plans. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12665-022-10430-9.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.