Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35668909›Full record

ReviewJAC-antimicrobial resistance2022

Comparison of the global prevalence and trend of human intestinal carriage of ESBL-producing

Yihienew M Bezabih, Alemayehu Bezabih, Michel Dion, Eric Batard, Samson Teka, Abiy Obole, Noah Dessalegn, Alelegn Enyew, Anna Roujeinikova, Endalkachew Alamneh and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. One Health Determinants ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yihienew M BezabihArsi University College of Health Sciences, University Road, Asella, ET 0193, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3499-6777
Alemayehu BezabihBahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Michel DionUniversity of Nantes, Microbiotas Hosts Antibiotics and bacterial Resistances Laboratory, Nantes, France.
Eric BatardUniversity of Nantes, Microbiotas Hosts Antibiotics and bacterial Resistances Laboratory, Nantes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1927-228X
Samson TekaMarshall University School of Medicine, Huntington, WV, USA.
Abiy OboleDepartment of Internal Medicine, WellStar Atlanta Medical Center, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Noah DessalegnDepartment of Internal Medicine, WellStar Atlanta Medical Center, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Alelegn EnyewBahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Anna RoujeinikovaDepartment of Microbiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8478-4751
Endalkachew AlamnehSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Corinne MirkazemiSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Gregory M PetersonSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Woldesellassie M BezabheSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3028-6949

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The widespread intestinal carriage of ESBL-producing Methods: Our systematic review included 133 articles published between 1 January 2000 and 22 April 2021 and indexed in PubMed, EMBASE or Google Scholar. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to obtain the global pooled prevalence (community and healthcare settings). Subgroup meta-analyses were performed by grouping studies using the WHO regions and 5 year intervals of the study period. Results: We found that 21.1% (95% CI, 19.1%-23.2%) of inpatients in healthcare settings and 17.6% (95% CI, 15.3%-19.8%) of healthy individuals worldwide carried ESBL Conclusions: The global and regional human intestinal ESBL

Identifiers

PMID35668909
PMCPMC9160884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.