Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35668822›Full record

ArticleSocial network analysis and mining2022

Public reactions towards Covid-19 vaccination through twitter before and after second wave in India.

Siddhi Mishra, Abhigya Verma, Kavita Meena, Rishabh Kaushal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social network analysis and mining, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Siddhi MishraDepartment of Information Technology, Indira Gandhi Delhi Technical University for Women, Kashmere Gate, New Delhi, Delhi 110006 India.
Abhigya VermaDepartment of Information Technology, Indira Gandhi Delhi Technical University for Women, Kashmere Gate, New Delhi, Delhi 110006 India.
Kavita MeenaDepartment of Information Technology, Indira Gandhi Delhi Technical University for Women, Kashmere Gate, New Delhi, Delhi 110006 India.
Rishabh KaushalDepartment of Information Technology, Indira Gandhi Delhi Technical University for Women, Kashmere Gate, New Delhi, Delhi 110006 India.ORCID 0000-0002-9200-7802

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social media have a significant impact on opinion building in public. Vaccination in India started in January 2021. We have seen many opinions towards vaccination of the people, as vaccination is one of the most crucial steps toward the fight against COVID-19. In this paper, we have compared the public's sentiments towards COVID vaccination in India before the second wave and after the second wave. We worked by extracting tweets regarding vaccination in India, building our datasets. We extracted 5977 tweets before the second wave and 42,936 tweets after the second wave. We annotated the collected tweets into four categories, namely Provaccine, Antivaccine, Hesitant and Cognizant. We built a baseline model for sentiment analysis and have used multiple classification techniques among which Random Forest using the TF-IDF vectorization technique gave the best accuracy of 69% using max-features and n-estimators as parameters.

Indexed as

Covid-19 vaccincationMachine learningSentiment classification

Identifiers

PMID35668822
PMCPMC9151355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.