Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35668788›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022

Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of ES

Manjula Ng, Shilpa Borehalli Mayegowda, L Priyanka, D Priyanka, Saad Alghamdi, Shalini Choudary, V Sanchita, G Chishmitha, Banan Atwah, Zain Alhindi and 1 more

RetractedOpen access · hybridAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Retracted: Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of ESEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Retraction · 2023-08-02Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/06372775B8AF8D88E166306DFD5BD2
  • Retracted
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Manjula NgSchool of Basic and Applied Sciences, Dayananda Sagar University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6874-1188
Shilpa Borehalli MayegowdaSchool of Basic and Applied Sciences, Dayananda Sagar University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
L PriyankaSchool of Basic and Applied Sciences, Dayananda Sagar University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
D PriyankaSchool of Basic and Applied Sciences, Dayananda Sagar University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Saad AlghamdiLaboratory Medicine Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4532-9128
Shalini ChoudarySchool of Basic and Applied Sciences, Dayananda Sagar University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
V SanchitaSchool of Basic and Applied Sciences, Dayananda Sagar University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
G ChishmithaSchool of Basic and Applied Sciences, Dayananda Sagar University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Banan AtwahLaboratory Medicine Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Zain AlhindiLaboratory Medicine Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Fahadul IslamDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Daffodil International University, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8514-2064
Dayananda Sagar University · INUmm al-Qura University · SADaffodil International University · BD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mobile phones have become an indispensable part of human lives for communication, education, and entertainment activities. This study aims to evaluate the diversity pattern of bacterial contaminants on mobiles and to check antibiotic resistance profiles in 105 samples. The study revealed a contamination of 51% in men and 49% in women, the highest in the 21- to 30-year age group, evidencing the extreme use of mobiles by teenagers. The study observed Gram-negative bacteria (63%) versus Gram-positive bacteria (37%). Overall, Gram-negative bacterial isolates showed the highest sensitivity to antibiotic nitrofurantoin (90%) and the lowest in ampicillin (35%). Gram positive has highest incidence of sensitivity towards tigecycline (100%) and lowest in cefoxitin (20%). ES

Identifiers

PMID35668788
PMCPMC9166947
OpenAlexW4281700575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.