Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35668737›Full record

ArticleRadiology research and practice2022

Volumetric Analysis of the Jaws in Skeletal Class I and III Patients with Different Facial Divergence Using CBCT Imaging.

Rama Yasser Alhawasli, Mowaffak A Ajaj, Mohammad Younis Hajeer, Assil Mohammad Raef Al-Zahabi, Luai Mahaini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rama Yasser AlhawasliDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5894-9601
Mowaffak A AjajDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8602-6986
Mohammad Younis HajeerDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0640-1297
Assil Mohammad Raef Al-ZahabiDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6436-109X
Luai MahainiDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9409-2775

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: The main objective was to evaluate any possible maxillary or mandibular volumetric difference between hyperdivergent skeletal Class III (CIII), normodivergent skeletal CIII, hypodivergent skeletal CIII, and normodivergent skeletal Class I (CI) patients using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Also, the secondary objective was to investigate any possible correlation between CBCT-derived lateral cephalometric variables and the mandibular and maxillary volumes (MdV and MxV, respectively). Materials and Methods: 80 CBCT images of patients between 18 and 32 years of age were taken with one CBCT imaging device (Scanora 3D®, Soredex, Tuusula, Finland). The sample consisted of four groups: 20 hypodivergent skeletal CIII (11 males and 9 females), 20 normodivergent skeletal CIII (7 males and 13 females), 20 hyperdivergent skeletal CIII (8 males and 12 females), and 20 normodivergent skeletal CI (5 males and 15 females). The volumes of both jaws and the ratio of MxV/MdV were obtained using Mimics™ 19 software (Materialise, NV, Belgium), and 2D variables were obtained from CBCT-derived lateral cephalogram using AudaxCeph™ software (Orthodontic software suite, Ljubljana, Slovenia). One-way ANOVA test and Kruskal-Wallis analysis were employed to detect any possible significant difference between the volumetric variables, whereas Pearson's and Spearman's correlation coefficients were calculated to detect any possible relationship between the 2D variables and the volumetric measurements. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the maxillary volume or maxillary/mandibular ratio between the four groups ( Conclusions: The mandibular volume of the Class III hypodivergent patient was significantly greater than that of the Class III hyperdivergent patients. Correlations between the maxillary or mandibular volumes were found with some of the 2D variables. The volume of both jaws increased when the maxillofacial complex moved toward a horizontal growth pattern.

Identifiers

PMID35668737
PMCPMC9167144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.