Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35668719›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Gesundheitswissenschaften = Journal of public health2022

The prospective relationship between loneliness, life satisfaction and psychological distress before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK.

Jelena Milicev, Pamela Qualter, Claire Goodfellow, Joanna Inchley, Sharon Anne Simpson, Alastair H Leyland, Kalpa Kharicha, Emily Long

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Gesundheitswissenschaften = Journal of public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Risk factors for loneliness: A literature review.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jelena MilicevMRC / CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G3 7HR UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0120-7495
Pamela QualterManchester Institute of Education, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6114-3820
Claire GoodfellowMRC / CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G3 7HR UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5990-8150
Joanna InchleyMRC / CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G3 7HR UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8322-8817
Sharon Anne SimpsonMRC / CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G3 7HR UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6219-1768
Alastair H LeylandMRC / CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G3 7HR UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3741-7099
Kalpa KharichaCampaign to End Loneliness part of What Works Centre for Wellbeing, London, SW1H 9EA UK.
Emily LongMRC / CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G3 7HR UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1512-4471

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SPHSU16Chief Scientist Office SPHSU17Chief Scientist Office SPHSU18Medical Research Council MC_UU_00022/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00022/2Medical Research Council MC_UU_00022/3Medical Research Council MR/S015078/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Mental wellbeing in the UK seems to have deteriorated significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic, with the rates of loneliness, life satisfaction and psychological distress taking longer to return to the pre-pandemic levels than elsewhere. Nevertheless, there is little knowledge about the interactions between these outcomes, or the factors that played a role in the rates of change. The current study aims to address this gap by simultaneously investigating changes in loneliness, life satisfaction and psychological distress in the UK from pre-pandemic levels to those between April and November 2020, while critically assessing the role of a range of social ecological influencing factors. Subject and Methods: Longitudinal data from Understanding Society (N=3475) were used to explore the changes in loneliness, life satisfaction and psychological distress from pre-pandemic levels (2017-2019) through November 2020, the interactions between these outcomes, and the role of individual, social, community and geographic factors in the rates of change, using multivariate latent growth curve model. Results: Loneliness, life satisfaction and psychological distress deteriorated minimally between April and November 2020, compared to the pre-pandemic levels (2017-2019), while the rate of change in each outcome influenced the rates of change in the other two. Key individual (age, gender, physical health), social (number of friends and similarity to them), and environmental (neighbourhood quality) variables influenced baseline scores and the rates of change. Conclusion: Considering significant dynamic associations between loneliness, life satisfaction and psychological distress, we argue that interventions to tackle any one of the outcomes may have beneficial effects on others, while highlighting malleable factors and individual and community-level interventions to tackle loneliness.

Indexed as

interventionsmental healthneighbourhoodssocial ecological model

Identifiers

PMID35668719
PMCPMC9136554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.