ArticleMolecular ecology resources2022
Identification and quantification of chimeric sequencing reads in a highly multiplexed RAD-seq protocol.
Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- ChimeraTE: a pipeline to detect chimeric transcripts derived from genes and transposable elements.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Identification and quantification of chimeric sequencing reads in a highly multiplexed RAD-seq protocol.Molecular ecology resources · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Highly multiplexed approaches have become common in genomic studies. They have improved the cost-effectiveness of genotyping hundreds of individuals using combinatorially barcoded adapters. These strategies, however, can potentially misassigned reads to incorrect samples. Here, we used a modified quaddRAD protocol to analyse the occurrence of index hopping and PCR chimeras in a series of experiments with up to 100 multiplexed samples per sequencing lane (639 samples in total). We created two types of sequencing libraries: four libraries of type A, where PCRs were run on individual samples before multiplexing, and three libraries of type B, where PCRs were run on pooled samples. We used fixed pairs of inner barcodes to identify chimeric reads. Type B libraries show a higher percentage of misassigned reads (1.15%) than type A libraries (0.65%). We also quantify the commonly undetectable chimeric sequences that occur whenever multiplexed groups of samples with different outer barcodes are sequenced together on a single flow cell. Our results suggest that these types of chimeric sequences represent up to 1.56% and 1.29% of reads in type A and B libraries, respectively. We also show that increasing the number of mismatches allowed for barcode rescue to above 2 dramatically increases the number of recovered chimeric reads. We provide recommendations for developing highly multiplexed RAD-seq protocols and analysing the resulting data to minimize the generation of chimeric sequences, allowing their quantification and a finer control on the number of PCR cycles necessary to generate enough input DNA for library preparation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.