Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35668611›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2022

Clinical Application of C-TIRADS Category and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Differential Diagnosis of Solid Thyroid Nodules Measuring ≥1 cm.

Zhuang Jin, Yaqiong Zhu, Yu Lei, Xin Yu, Nan Jiang, Yue Gao, Junying Cao

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Arrival-Time Parametric Imaging in Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Thyroid Nodule Differentiation.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zhuang JinDepartment of Ultrasound, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, Liaoning, China (mainland).
Yaqiong ZhuDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China (mainland).
Yu LeiDalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China (mainland).
Xin YuDepartment of Ultrasound, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, Liaoning, China (mainland).
Nan JiangDepartment of Ultrasound, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, Liaoning, China (mainland).
Yue GaoDepartment of Ultrasound, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, Liaoning, China (mainland).
Junying CaoDepartment of Ultrasound, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, Liaoning, China (mainland).
General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region · CNChinese PLA General Hospital · CNDalian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (C-TIRADS) category combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in diagnosing thyroid cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS From October 2020 to March 2021, 116 thyroid nodules from 113 patients who underwent conventional ultrasound and CEUS examinations at the General Hospital of Northern Theater Command were reviewed. In the conventional ultrasound examination, thyroid nodules were categorized by C-TIRADS. The nodules were reclassified based on CEUS scoring, then a combined diagnosis was made. The pathological results were taken as the criterion standard. To compare the diagnostic performance of the 3 methods according to the receiver operating characteristic curves produced for thyroid nodules. RESULTS After chi-square test, the 7 characteristics of enhancement patterns, internal homogeneity, wash-in, wash-out, ring enhancement, morphology, and contrast agent retention characteristics (CAR) were statistically different between malignant and benign tumors; A high diagnostic performance was demonstrated by C-TIRADS combined with CEUS in diagnosing thyroid cancer. The area under the curve (AUC), the sensitivity, and the specificity of C-TIRADS combined with CEUS for diagnosing thyroid cancer were 0.918 (95% CI: 0.852-0.961), 80.9% (95% CI: 69.1-89.8%), and 90.6% (95% CI: 79.3-96.9%), respectively. The AUC of C-TIRADS alone was significantly lower than that of C-TIRADS combined with CEUS (P=0.0056), while there was no significant difference between CEUS and C-TIRADS combined with CEUS (P=0.59). CONCLUSIONS The combined method of C-TIRADS and CEUS, with reduced rate of thyroid nodule biopsy and clinical application value, has higher diagnostic accuracy than the single diagnosis method.

Indexed as

Thyroid NeoplasmsThyroid NoduleDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansRetrospective StudiesUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID35668611
PMCPMC9188288
OpenAlexW4280575478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.