Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35668541›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine and health2022

Medicinal plant use, conservation, and the associated traditional knowledge in rural communities in Eastern Uganda.

Jamilu E Ssenku, Shaban A Okurut, Aidah Namuli, Ali Kudamba, Patience Tugume, Paul Matovu, Godfrey Wasige, Hussein M Kafeero, Abdul Walusansa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine and health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jamilu E SsenkuDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Islamic University in Uganda, Mbale, Uganda. jssenku@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3220-8319
Shaban A OkurutDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Islamic University in Uganda, Mbale, Uganda.
Aidah NamuliDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Islamic University in Uganda, Mbale, Uganda.
Ali KudambaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Islamic University in Uganda, Mbale, Uganda.
Patience TugumeDepartment of Plant Sciences, Microbiology and Biotechnology, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Paul MatovuDepartment of Plant Sciences, Microbiology and Biotechnology, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Godfrey WasigeDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Islamic University in Uganda, Mbale, Uganda.
Hussein M KafeeroDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Habib Medical School, Islamic University in Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Abdul WalusansaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Islamic University in Uganda, Mbale, Uganda.

Funding

Islamic Development Bank (IsDB) RCC/2019/GROUP2/005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe global consumption of herbal medicine is increasing steadily, posing an extinction risk to medicinal plants. Uganda is among the top ten countries with a high threat of herbal medicine extinction, and Traditional Medicinal Knowledge (TMK) erosion. This might be attributed to the inadequate documentation, plus many more unclear hindrances. In this study, plant species used to treat human diseases in Butaleja district in Eastern Uganda and their associated TMK were documented. The conservation methods for medicinal plants were also evaluated. The rationale was to support the preservation of ethnopharmacological knowledge.

methodsData were collected from 80 herbalists using semi-structured questionnaires, from July 2020 to March 2021. Additionally, guided field walks and observations were conducted. Quantitative indices such as, use categories and informant consensus factor (ICF) were evaluated to elucidate the importance of the medicinal plants. Data were analyzed using STATA version-15.0 software.

resultsIn total, 133 species, belonging to 34 families and 125 genera were identified. Fabaceae (65%), and Solanaceae (29%) were the dominant families. Leaves (80%), and roots (15%), were the commonest parts used in medicinal preparations; mostly administered orally as decoctions (34.6%) and infusions (16%). The commonest illnesses treated were cough (7.74%), gastric ulcers (7.42%), and malaria (4.52%). The informant consensus factor was high for all disease categories (≥ 0.8), indicating homogeneity of knowledge about remedies used. Only 73% of the respondents made efforts to conserve medicinal plants. The commonest conservation strategy was preservation of forests with spiritually valued species (100%), while compliance with government regulations was the rarest (4.5%). Overall, efforts to stop the extinction of medicinal plants and TMK were inadequate. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS: There was enormous dependency on a rich diversity of medicinal plant species and TMK for healthcare and income generation. The potential for medicinal plant biodiversity loss was evident due to habitat destruction. Inclusion of traditional cultural norms in conservation strategies, and laboratory-based efficacy tests for the species identified are necessary, to promote the conservative and utilization of validated herbal medicines and TMK in rural settings.

Indexed as

Butaleja districtHerbal medicine conservationIndigenous medicinal knowledgeTraditional medicineUganda

Identifiers

PMID35668541
PMCPMC9168352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.