Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35668530›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2022

X-ray driven peanut trait estimation: computer vision aided agri-system transformation.

Martha Domhoefer, Debarati Chakraborty, Eva Hufnagel, Joelle Claußen, Norbert Wörlein, Marijn Voorhaar, Krithika Anbazhagan, Sunita Choudhary, Janila Pasupuleti, Rekha Baddam and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Martha DomhoeferCrops Physiology & Modeling, Accelerated Crop Improvement Research Theme, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, 502324, Telangana, India.
Debarati ChakrabortyCrops Physiology & Modeling, Accelerated Crop Improvement Research Theme, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, 502324, Telangana, India.
Eva HufnagelDevelopment Center for X-Ray Technology (Entwicklungszentrum Röntgentechnik, EZRT), Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Circuits (Institut Für Integrierte Schaltungen, IIS), Flugplatzstraße 75, 90768, Fürth, Germany.
Joelle ClaußenDevelopment Center for X-Ray Technology (Entwicklungszentrum Röntgentechnik, EZRT), Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Circuits (Institut Für Integrierte Schaltungen, IIS), Flugplatzstraße 75, 90768, Fürth, Germany.
Norbert WörleinDevelopment Center for X-Ray Technology (Entwicklungszentrum Röntgentechnik, EZRT), Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Circuits (Institut Für Integrierte Schaltungen, IIS), Flugplatzstraße 75, 90768, Fürth, Germany.
Marijn VoorhaarCrops Physiology & Modeling, Accelerated Crop Improvement Research Theme, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, 502324, Telangana, India.
Krithika AnbazhaganCrops Physiology & Modeling, Accelerated Crop Improvement Research Theme, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, 502324, Telangana, India.
Sunita ChoudharyCrops Physiology & Modeling, Accelerated Crop Improvement Research Theme, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, 502324, Telangana, India.
Janila PasupuletiCrops Physiology & Modeling, Accelerated Crop Improvement Research Theme, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, 502324, Telangana, India.
Rekha BaddamCrops Physiology & Modeling, Accelerated Crop Improvement Research Theme, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, 502324, Telangana, India.
Jana KholovaCrops Physiology & Modeling, Accelerated Crop Improvement Research Theme, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, 502324, Telangana, India.
Stefan GerthDevelopment Center for X-Ray Technology (Entwicklungszentrum Röntgentechnik, EZRT), Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Circuits (Institut Für Integrierte Schaltungen, IIS), Flugplatzstraße 75, 90768, Fürth, Germany. stefan.gerth@iis.fraunhofer.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5590-2920

Funding

Provozně Ekonomická Fakulta, Česká Zemědělská Univerzita v Praze 2022B0006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn India, raw peanuts are obtained by aggregators from smallholder farms in the form of whole pods and the price is based on a manual estimation of basic peanut pod and kernel characteristics. These methods of raw produce evaluation are slow and can result in procurement irregularities. The procurement delays combined with the lack of storage facilities lead to fungal contaminations and pose a serious threat to food safety in many regions. To address this gap, we investigated whether X-ray technology could be used for the rapid assessment of the key peanut qualities that are important for price estimation.

resultsWe generated 1752 individual peanut pod 2D X-ray projections using a computed tomography (CT) system (CTportable160.90). Out of these projections we predicted the kernel weight and shell weight, which are important indicators of the produce price. Two methods for the feature prediction were tested: (i) X-ray image transformation (XRT) and (ii) a trained convolutional neural network (CNN). The prediction power of these methods was tested against the gravimetric measurements of kernel weight and shell weight in diverse peanut pod varieties

conclusionOur study demonstrated that the X-ray based system is a relevant technology option for the estimation of key peanut produce indicators (Figure 1). The obtained results justify further research to adapt the existing X-ray system for the rapid, accurate and objective peanut procurement process. Fast and accurate estimates of produce value are a necessary pre-requisite to avoid post-harvest losses due to fungal contamination and, at the same time, allow the fair payment to farmers. Additionally, the same technology could also assist crop improvement programs in selecting and developing peanut cultivars with enhanced economic value in a high-throughput manner by skipping the shelling of the pods completely. This study demonstrated the technical feasibility of the approach and is a first step to realize a technology-driven peanut production system transformation of the future.

Indexed as

Convolutional neural network (CNN)Kernel weightPeanut productionShelling percentageTechnology-driven system transformationX-ray

Identifiers

PMID35668530
PMCPMC9169268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.