ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2022
Real-world clinicopathological features and outcome of thymic neuroendocrine tumors: a retrospective single-institution analysis.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Thymic neuroendocrine tumours: molecular landscape, immune microenvironment and therapeutic perspectives.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Review
- Thymic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Evolving Insights and Innovative Approaches.JTO clinical and research reports · 2026Review
- Article
- Complete surgical resection of cortisol secreting neuroendocrine thymic tumour: a case report.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of surufatinib in the treatment of thymic neuroendocrine tumors: a 102-case retrospective study.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Narrative review of the prognostic significance of primary tumor size in thymic epithelial tumor.Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China) · 2025Review
- Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the thymus.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- The combination of etoposide and platinum for the treatment of thymic neuroendocrine neoplasms: A retrospective analysis.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Significance of the Surgical Treatment with Lymph Node Dissection for Neuroendocrine Tumors of Thymus.Cancers · 2023Article
- Thymic neuroendocrine neoplasms-what we know, what we don't know, and what to do about it.Translational cancer research · 2023Article
- Article
- Case report: Radiofrequency ablation combined with biopsy for Cushing's syndrome due to ectopic ACTH lesions in the lung.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThymic neuroendocrine tumors comprise a heterogeneous group of rare diseases. This study aimed to investigate the real-world clinicopathological features and treatment outcomes of thymic neuroendocrine tumors.
resultsA total of 104 patients diagnosed with thymic neuroendocrine tumors in a single institution from 1983 to 2021 were eligible. Fourteen (13.46%) and 28 (26.92%) patients diagnosed with thymic neuroendocrine tumors suffered from multiple endocrine neoplasia and ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome, respectively. Ninety-seven (93.27%) patients underwent surgical resection, including 79 (81.44%) with radical resection. Except for 5 patients lost during follow-up, the 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 91.8%, 70.2% and 54.6%, respectively. The median overall survival was 61.57 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that years at diagnosis (HR 0.559, 95% CI 0.364-0.857, p = 0.008), radical resection (HR 2.860, 95% CI 1.392-5.878, p = 0.004), pathological grade (HR 1.963, 95% CI 1.058-3.644, p = 0.033) and Masaoka-Koga stage (HR 2.250, 95% CI 1.548-3.272, p = 0.000) exerted significant differences in overall survival among 99 patients. In the surgery group, multivariate Cox regression analysis exhibited significant overall survival differences in years at diagnosis (HR 0.563, 95% CI 0.367-0.866, p = 0.009), neoadjuvant therapy (HR 0.248, 95% CI 0.071-0.872, p = 0.030), radical resection (HR 3.674, 95% CI 1.685-8.008, p = 0.001), pathological grade (HR 2.082, 95% CI 1.098-3.947, p = 0.025) and Masaoka-Koga stage (HR 2.445, 95% CI 1.607-3.719, p = 0.000).
conclusionsRadical resection and Masaoka-Koga stage were independent prognostic factors for the survival of patients with thymic neuroendocrine tumors. Systemic therapy and integrated management of patients with advanced-stage disease require high-level clinical evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.