Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35668473›Full record

ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2022

Revised paper ASIM-D-21-00055R1: "Consulting properly rather than acting": advocating for real patient involvement in summative OSCEs.

Grainne P Kearney, Jennifer L Johnston, Nigel D Hart, Kathy M Cullen, Gerard J Gormley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Grainne P KearneyCentre for Medical Education, Queen's University Belfast, Whitla Medical Building, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT9 7BL, UK. g.kearney@qub.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9686-3198
Jennifer L JohnstonCentre for Medical Education, Queen's University Belfast, Whitla Medical Building, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT9 7BL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3999-8774
Nigel D HartCentre for Medical Education, Queen's University Belfast, Whitla Medical Building, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT9 7BL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8168-1746
Kathy M CullenCentre for Medical Education, Queen's University Belfast, Whitla Medical Building, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT9 7BL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6207-0491
Gerard J GormleyCentre for Medical Education, Queen's University Belfast, Whitla Medical Building, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT9 7BL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1701-7920

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this "Advancing simulation practice" article, we offer an expose of the involvement of real patients in Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs), inviting educators who traditionally involve solely SPs in their summative OSCEs to consider the practice. The need for standardisation in summative assessments can make educators understandably wary to try this, even if the rhetoric to involve real patients is accepted. We offer this as an instance of the tussle between standardisation and validity experienced throughout health professions education. MAIN TEXT: We offer our experience and empirical evidence of this simulation practice, based on an institutional ethnographic examination of the involvement of real patients in summative OSCEs from an undergraduate medical school in the UK. Our critique demonstrates the merits of this approach as an assessment environment closer to the real clinical environments where these soon-to-be doctors interact in a more authentic way with real patients and their illness experiences. We balance this against the extra work required for all involved and suggest the biggest challenge is in the reorientation work required for both Faculty and students who are institutionalised to expect standardisation above all in assessment.

conclusionWe advocate for involving real patients in summative OSCEs and hope that readers may feel compelled and empowered to foster this shift in mindset required to introduce this practice into their assessments.

Indexed as

Institutional ethnographyOSCESSimulationSPs

Identifiers

PMID35668473
PMCPMC9169305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.