Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35668450›Full record

ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2022

Promoting medical student engagement through co-development and peer-assisted learning: a new patient safety course as a case study.

Jesper Dybdal Kayser, Anne Mielke-Christensen, Doris Østergaard, Peter Dieckmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jesper Dybdal KayserCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Herlev Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, Entrance 1, 25th floor, DK-2730, Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark. Jesperkayser@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4818-844X
Anne Mielke-ChristensenCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Herlev Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, Entrance 1, 25th floor, DK-2730, Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
Doris ØstergaardCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Herlev Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, Entrance 1, 25th floor, DK-2730, Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
Peter DieckmannCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Herlev Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, Entrance 1, 25th floor, DK-2730, Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeer-assisted learning programs have been focused on providing students with competencies to deliver lectures and facilitate workshops, whereas involvement of students as co-developers of educational programmes has been relatively under-described in the literature. Likewise, the use of students as facilitators in simulation-based training and debriefing is also scarce. In this paper, we describe how medical students were co-developers of a novel course on patient safety and how they were trained as student facilitators to conduct simulation-based training and debriefing, as well as workshops.

methodsMedical students co-developed a course in patient safety consisting of three simulation-based scenarios and three workshops. The students were educated in relevant patient safety topics. They were trained to become student facilitators to conduct workshops, simulations and debriefings at a patient safety course for medical students. A questionnaire was developed to evaluate the course participants´ perception of the learning objectives and the student facilitators following the latest course in 2020. In addition, semi-structured interviews with the student facilitators were conducted to explore their perceptions of being part of the course.

resultsA total of 92% of the course participants completed the evaluation of the course. The majority of the course participants found that the student facilitators created a safe learning environment and had the necessary skills to teach. The learning objectives for the course were found to be useful. A total of 10 interviews with the student facilitators were conducted. We found that the student facilitators were motivated to teach in the course, as a way of improving their teamwork, leadership qualities and communication skills, as well as their resume. Some of the student facilitators mentioned that they were able to create a safe learning environment, whereas others mentioned a feeling of inadequacy for their teacher role. In addition to developing their teaching skills, they mentioned that they developed their medical expertise, alongside their communication-, collaboration-, leadership- and professional skills.

conclusionThis study illustrates how medical students were involved in the co-development, delivery and implementation of a course in patient safety. The evaluation of the course shows that student facilitators succeeded in creating a safe learning environment. The interviews of the student facilitators reveal their various motivations for teaching, in addition to different perceptions of their experience as a student facilitator. Some expressed a positive feeling of being able to establish a safe learning environment, whilst others expressed a feeling of inadequacy when facilitating peers. In addition, the student facilitators indicated that they developed themselves both professionally and personally.

Indexed as

Curriculum developmentMedical studentsNear-peer teachingNon-technical skillsPatient safetyPeer-assisted learningSimulationStudent facilitator

Identifiers

PMID35668450
PMCPMC9169342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.