ArticleBMC surgery2022
Treatment of symptomatic hip dysplasia by posterolateral small incision assisted Bernese periacetabular osteotomy.
Article in BMC surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Substantial blood loss and transfusion burden after periacetabular osteotomy: Benchmark estimates from a systematic review and meta-analysis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Pooled it
- Learning curve in periacetabular osteotomy for developmental dysplasia of the hip : a systematic review and meta-analysis.Bone & joint open · 2026Pooled it
- Association of tranexamic acid use and autologous predonation with blood loss and transfusion outcomes after periacetabular osteotomy: An arm-based multilevel meta analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Mid-term outcomes of modified colonna capsular arthroplasty in adolescent and young adult patient with unilateral hip dysplasia dislocation.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFor periacetabular osteotomy, traditional approaches usually have a long learning curve. We aimed to evaluate the postoperative results and complications of periacetabular osteotomy under a new double-incision approach.
methodsThe records of 58 consecutive patients (65 hips) who underwent periacetabular osteotomy using the new approach were retrospectively reviewed and evaluated. There were 52 women and 6 men with a mean age of 28.1 years at the time of surgery.
resultsThe average follow-up period was 35.2 months, during which no patients were converted to total hip arthroplasty. Complications included 6 hips (9.2%) with nerve dysesthesias and 1 hip (1.5%) with delayed wound healing. The mean operative time and intraoperative blood loss were 88.6 min and 402.8 ml, respectively. The mean modified Harris hip score had improved from 72.2 points preoperatively to 91.3 points at the last follow-up. Fifty-five patients (62 hips, 95.4%) were satisfied to their outcomes, and good preoperative functional score was associated with a satisfactory outcome. Furthermore, the average lateral center-edge angle, anterior center-edge angle and acetabular index angle were corrected well after surgery.
conclusionPeriacetabular osteotomy using modified Smith-Petersen or Bikini approach with posterolateral assisted small incision can be performed safely and with satisfactory results. In addition, this technique shortens the learning curve, and reduces the operating complexity, especially for beginner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.