Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35668293›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2022

Preferred music listening is associated with perceptual learning enhancement at the expense of self-focused attention.

Pietro Sarasso, Paolo Barbieri, Elena Del Fante, Ludovico Bechis, Marco Neppi-Modona, Katiuscia Sacco, Irene Ronga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The aesthetic valve: how aesthetic appreciation may switch emotional states from anxiety to curiosity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pietro SarassoBIP (BraIn Plasticity and behaviour changes) Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Paolo BarbieriBIP (BraIn Plasticity and behaviour changes) Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Elena Del FanteBIP (BraIn Plasticity and behaviour changes) Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Ludovico BechisBIP (BraIn Plasticity and behaviour changes) Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Marco Neppi-ModonaBIP (BraIn Plasticity and behaviour changes) Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Katiuscia SaccoBIP (BraIn Plasticity and behaviour changes) Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy. katiuscia.sacco@unito.it.
Irene RongaBIP (BraIn Plasticity and behaviour changes) Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy. irene.ronga@unito.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2960-4639

Funding

Finpiemonte (Italy) POR FESR 2014/2020, n.320-36
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Can preferred music listening improve following attentional and learning performances? Here we suggest that this may be the case. In Experiment 1, following preferred and non-preferred musical-piece listening, we recorded electrophysiological responses to an auditory roving-paradigm. We computed the mismatch negativity (MMN - the difference between responses to novel and repeated stimulation), as an index of perceptual learning, and we measured the correlation between trial-by-trial EEG responses and the fluctuations in Bayesian Surprise, as a quantification of the neural attunement with stimulus informational value. Furthermore, during music listening, we recorded oscillatory cortical activity. MMN and trial-by-trial correlation with Bayesian surprise were significantly larger after subjectively preferred versus non-preferred music, indicating the enhancement of perceptual learning. The analysis on oscillatory activity during music listening showed a selective alpha power increased in response to preferred music, an effect often related to cognitive enhancements. In Experiment 2, we explored whether this learning improvement was realized at the expense of self-focused attention. Therefore, after preferred versus non-preferred music listening, we collected Heart-Beat Detection (HBD) accuracy, as a measure of the attentional focus toward the self. HBD was significantly lowered following preferred music listening. Overall, our results suggest the presence of a specific neural mechanism that, in response to aesthetically pleasing stimuli, and through the modulation of alpha oscillatory activity, redirects neural resources away from the self and toward the environment. This attentional up-weighting of external stimuli might be fruitfully exploited in a wide area of human learning activities, including education, neurorehabilitation and therapy.

Indexed as

MusicAcoustic StimulationAttentionAuditory PerceptionBayes TheoremElectroencephalographyHumansAttentionECGEEGHeartbeatLearningMMNMusicNeuroaesthetics

Identifiers

PMID35668293
PMCPMC9722857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.