Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35668292›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2022

Exploring the relationship between retrieval practice, self-efficacy, and memory.

Andrea N Frankenstein, Onyinye J Udeogu, Matthew P McCurdy, Allison M Sklenar, Eric D Leshikar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrea N FrankensteinUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, 1007 West Harrison Street (M/C 285), Chicago, IL, 60607, USA.
Onyinye J UdeoguUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, 1007 West Harrison Street (M/C 285), Chicago, IL, 60607, USA.
Matthew P McCurdyUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, 1007 West Harrison Street (M/C 285), Chicago, IL, 60607, USA.
Allison M SklenarUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, 1007 West Harrison Street (M/C 285), Chicago, IL, 60607, USA.
Eric D LeshikarUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, 1007 West Harrison Street (M/C 285), Chicago, IL, 60607, USA. leshikar@uic.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retrieval practice effect refers to improved memory on a final test for information retrieved one or more times. Although past theoretical work identifies cognitive mechanisms to explain retrieval practice benefits, it is possible that improving self-efficacy during learning may also contribute to better memory, in line with limited past work showing a relationship between self-efficacy and memory. Across two experiments, we examine the potential relationship between retrieval practice, self-efficacy, and memory. In Experiment 1, we examined the extent change in self-efficacy accounted for improved memory on a final test after retrieval practice compared with restudy. In Experiment 2, we gave participants (false) feedback that was either negative (i.e., you performed worse than others), neutral (i.e., you performed the same as others), or positive (i.e., you performed better than others) to more directly assess the effects of self-efficacy on memory under retrieval practice conditions. Results of Experiment 1 showed a significant retrieval practice effect, with memory on the final test being better after retrieval practice compared with restudy. Self-efficacy did not significantly mediate the retrieval practice effect. Results of Experiment 2, however, showed that decreases in self-efficacy due to (false) negative feedback resulted in worse memory performance compared with neutral feedback. Such findings may suggest that change in self-efficacy after retrieval practice attempts, particularly negative feedback, affects memory at final test. Overall, these findings suggest a relationship between retrieval practice, self-efficacy, and memory, and imply that interventions that influence self-efficacy may be a plausible mechanism to modulate memory under some conditions.

Indexed as

Mental RecallSelf EfficacyCognitionHumansLearningMemoryRetrieval practiceSelf-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID35668292
PMCPMC9170123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.