Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35668047›Full record

ArticleEchocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)2022

The quality, safety, feasibility, and interpretive accuracy of echocardiographic and lung ultrasound assessment of COVID-19 patients using a hand-held ultrasound.

Ziv Dadon, Nir Levi, Evan Avraham Alpert, Amir Orlev, Daniel Belman, Michael Glikson, Adi Butnaru, Shmuel Gottlieb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ziv DadonJesselson Integrated Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-8497-0423
Nir LeviJesselson Integrated Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Evan Avraham AlpertDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Amir OrlevJesselson Integrated Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Daniel BelmanIntensive Care Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Michael GliksonJesselson Integrated Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Adi ButnaruJesselson Integrated Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Shmuel GottliebJesselson Integrated Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-9147-4524

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe association between COVID-19 infection and the cardiovascular system necessitates the use of an echocardiogram in this setting. Information on the utilization, safety, and quality of point-of-care cardiac and lung ultrasound using a hand-held device in these patients is scarce.

aimsTo investigate the safety, technical aspects, quality indices, and interpretive accuracy of a hand-held echocardiogram in patients with COVID-19.

methodsFrom April-28 through July-27, 2020, consecutive patients with COVID-19 underwent hand-held echocardiogram and lung ultrasound evaluation (Vscan Extend™; GE Healthcare) within 48-h of admission. The operators recorded a series of technical parameters and graded individual experiences. The examinations were further analyzed by a blinded fellowship-trained echocardiographer for general quality, proper acquisition, and right ventricular (RV) demonstration.

resultsAmong 103 patients, 66 (64.1%) were male. Twenty-nine (28.2%) patients could not turn on their left side and 23 (22.3%) could not maintain effective communication. The mean length of each echocardiogram study was 8.5 ± 2.9 min, battery usage was 14 ± 5%, and mean operator-to-patient proximity was 59 ± 11 cm. Ninety-five (92.2%) examinations were graded as fair/good quality. A fair agreement was demonstrated between the operator and the echocardiographer for general ultrasound quality (Kappa = 0.329, p < 0.001). A fair-good correlation (r = 0.679, p < 0.001) and substantial agreement (Kappa = 0.612, p < 0.001) were demonstrated between the operator and echocardiographer for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), whereas a fair agreement was demonstrated for RV systolic function (Kappa = 0.308, p = 0.002). LVEF agreement was also assessed using the Bland-Altman analysis revealing a mean bias of -0.96 (95% limits of agreement 9.43 to -11.35; p = 0.075).

conclusionsAmong patients with COVID-19, echocardiography with a hand-held ultrasound is a safe and reasonable alternative for a complete formal study (<10% poor-quality indices). Echocardiogram assessment by the operators during the exam acquisition is reliable for LVEF, while RV systolic function should be subsequently offline reassessed.

Indexed as

COVID-19EchocardiographyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLungMaleStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftCOVID-19echocardiographyfeasibility studiesphysiologysafetyventricular function

Identifiers

PMID35668047
PMCPMC9348495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.