Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35667947›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery2023

Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma of the maxillofacial and sinonasal region: a systematic review of presenting characteristics, treatment modalities, and associated outcomes.

R S Wockner, R R Seethala, T I Emeto, J A McCaul, S S Subramaniam

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

R S WocknerUniversity of Otago, School of Medicine, Wellington, New Zealand. Electronic address: rupertwck@gmail.com.
R R SeethalaDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
T I EmetoPublic Health and Tropical Medicine, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia; World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Vector-Borne and Neglected Tropical Diseases, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia; Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
J A McCaulDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
S S SubramaniamDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria, Australia; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Townsville University Hospital, Queensland, Australia.
James Cook University · AUQueen Elizabeth University Hospital · GBThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUUniversity of Otago · NZUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JOHN C. BYRD · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma (EMC) is a rare salivary gland malignancy. Controversy exists in the literature regarding the effectiveness of treatment modalities employed in the management of EMC. This systematic review was undertaken to understand the presenting characteristics of EMC and identify the most common treatment modalities and their associated outcomes, in order to help guide an evidenced-based approach to the algorithm of care. The MEDLINE (PubMed) and Embase databases were searched (up to February 23, 2022), and the review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Fifty-seven studies (51 case reports and six case series) describing 91 cases of EMC were included in this review. In the included studies, a slow-growing painless mass was the most common presenting clinical feature. EMC was most frequently treated with surgery alone (65%). Local disease recurrence occurred in 24% of the cases and metastatic disease in 11%. A positive surgical margin was found to be associated with a higher risk of recurrence (P < 0.001), while adjuvant radiotherapy was associated with a decreased risk of local disease recurrence (P = 0.034). Metastatic disease and multimodal therapy were found to be associated with decreased disease-free and overall survival (all P < 0.05). The current literature supports surgery with clear margins as the mainstay of treatment for EMC of the salivary and seromucous glands of the head and neck. In certain situations, radiotherapy may improve disease-free survival.

Indexed as

CarcinomaMyoepitheliomaSalivary Gland NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalHead and neck cancerMouth neoplasmsRadiotherapySalivary gland neoplasmsSalivary glands

Identifiers

PMID35667947
PMCPMC11227655
OpenAlexW4281663060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.