ArticleValue in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research2022
Designing and Implementing Deliberative Processes for Health Technology Assessment: A Good Practices Report of a Joint HTAi/ISPOR Task Force.
Article in Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Value and Implementation of Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement in Health Technology Assessment for Japan: implications from systematic searches.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2025Pooled it
- Uncertainty in Economic Evaluation: A Pragmatic Guide for Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Agencies in Resource-Constrained Settings.PharmacoEconomics · 2026Review
- Video-Algorithmic Patient Monitoring in Mental Health Inpatient Settings: Qualitative Study of Patient or Consumer, Clinician, and Vendor Perspectives.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Balancing the impact of socio-ethical and economic considerations on clinical-hospital decision-making.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Readiness to Consider and Adopt Genetic and Genomic Tests in Canada-An Update to the State of Readiness Report.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- The RELIANT checklist: a novel approach to revealing implicit factors in HTA deliberations.Health policy OPEN · 2026Article
- Rethinking the role of health technology assessment: from gatekeeper to health system shaper.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2026Article
- A case study integrating scenario thinking with dialysis policymaking in Thailand.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Good Practices for Health Technology Assessment Guideline Development: A Report of the Health Technology Assessment International, HTAsiaLink, and ISPOR Special Task Force.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2025Article
- Deliberative process of health technology reassessment by health technology assessment agency in Korea.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2024Article
- Lifecycle HTA: promising applications and a framework for implementation. An HTAi Global Policy Forum Task Force report.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2024Review
- An Inclusive Civil Society Dialogue for Successful Implementation of the EU HTA Regulation: Call to Action to Ensure Appropriate Involvement of Stakeholders and Collaborators.Journal of market access & health policy · 2024Article
- Conducting a health technology assessment in the West Bank, occupied Palestinian territory: lessons from a feasibility project.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2024Review
- The Use of Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Designing the Essential Package of Health Services in Pakistan.International journal of health policy and management · 2024Article
- Article
- Implicit factors influencing the HTA deliberative processes in 5 European countries: results from a mixed-methods research.Health policy OPEN · 2023Article
- Deliberative processes in health technology assessment of medicines: the case of Spain.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2023Review
- Progress toward Health System Readiness for Genome-Based Testing in Canada.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesDeliberative processes for health technology assessment (HTA) are intended to facilitate participatory decision making, using discussion and open dialogue between stakeholders. Increasing attention is being given to deliberative processes, but guidance is lacking for those who wish to design or use them. Health Technology Assessment International (HTAi) and ISPOR-The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research initiated a joint Task Force to address this gap.
methodsThe joint Task Force consisted of 15 members with different backgrounds, perspectives, and expertise relevant to the field. It developed guidance and a checklist for deliberative processes for HTA. The guidance builds upon the few, existing initiatives in the field, as well as input from the HTA community following an established consultation plan. In addition, the guidance was subject to 2 rounds of peer review.
resultsA deliberative process for HTA consists of procedures, activities, and events that support the informed and critical examination of an issue and the weighing of arguments and evidence to guide a subsequent decision. Guidance and an accompanying checklist are provided for (i) developing the governance and structure of an HTA program and (ii) informing how the various stages of an HTA process might be managed using deliberation.
conclusionsThe guidance and the checklist contain a series of questions, grouped by 6 phases of a model deliberative process. They are offered as practical tools for those wishing to establish or improve deliberative processes for HTA that are fit for local contexts. The tools can also be used for independent scrutiny of deliberative processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.