ReviewBiomedical journal2022
Tools to measure membrane potential of neurons.
Review in Biomedical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of Design of Electrodes and Interfaces for Non-Contact and Capacitive Biomedical Measurements: Terminology, Electrical Model, and System Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- WhenAPL bioengineering · 2025Review
- Emerging Approaches to Mitigate Neural Cell Degeneration with Nanoparticles-Enhanced Polyelectrolyte Systems.Membranes · 2025Review
- Water-Soluble Molecular Wires for Membrane Potential Imaging.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025Article
- Review
- Review of electrophysiological models to study membrane potential changes in breast cancer cell transformation and tumor progression.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
- Modeling internal charge effects on capacitor dynamics for non-invasive estimation of membrane potential.Biology methods & protocols · 2025Article
- Nitrile Vibrational Lifetimes as Probes of Local Electric Fields.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2024Article
- Fluorescence Imaging of Cell Membrane Potential: From Relative Changes to Absolute Values.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- A concerted effort combating hepatitis.Biomedical journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The brain is the most unexplored part of our body. The lack of sufficient tools has hindered our understanding of the brain and the associated diseases. The study of neurons and the neuronal network will help elucidate how the brain functions and related disorders. Over the last few decades, an increasing number of techniques have been reported to study neurons and neuronal communication in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo. These methods have pushed the boundaries of neuroscience and elucidated more information than ever before; however, much more requires to be done to understand the brain in its entirety. In this review article, I discuss the principles and the advantages and disadvantages of the classical electrode-based recording techniques and the optical imaging-based methods, which have aided neuroscientists in understanding neuronal communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.