Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35667525›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2022

A Prior Knowledge-Guided, Deep Learning-Based Semiautomatic Segmentation for Complex Anatomy on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Ying Zhang, Ying Liang, Jie Ding, Asma Amjad, Eric Paulson, Ergun Ahunbay, William A Hall, Beth Erickson, X Allen Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Imaging: A Systematic Review.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. HAR-Net: Automatic delineation of clinical target volumes for cervical cancer guided by hierarchical anatomical refinement.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ying ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Ying LiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Jie DingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Asma AmjadDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Eric PaulsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Ergun AhunbayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
William A HallDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Beth EricksonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
X Allen LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Electronic address: ali@mcw.edu.

Funding

Machine learning accelerated on-line adaptive replanningR01CA247960 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI PAULSON, ERIC S · 2020 to 2024
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA247960
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite recent substantial improvement in autosegmentation using deep learning (DL) methods, labor-intensive and time-consuming slice-by-slice manual editing is often needed, particularly for complex anatomy (eg, abdominal organs). This work aimed to develop a fast, prior knowledge-guided DL semiautomatic segmentation (DL-SAS) method for complex structures on abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A novel application using contours on an adjacent slice as a prior knowledge informant in a 2-dimensional UNet DL model to guide autosegmentation for a subsequent slice was implemented for DL-SAS. A generalized, instead of organ-specific, DL-SAS model was trained and tested for abdominal organs on T2-weighted MRI scans collected from 75 patients (65 for training and 10 for testing). The DL-SAS model performance was compared with 3 common autocontouring methods (linear interpolation, rigid propagation, and a full 3-dimensional DL autosegmentation model trained with the same training data set) based on various quantitative metrics including the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and ratio of acceptable slices (ROA) using paired t tests.

resultsFor the 10 testing cases, the DL-SAS model performed best with the slice interval (SI) of 1, resulting in an average DSC of 0.93 ± 0.02, 0.92 ± 0.02, 0.91 ± 0.02, 0.88 ± 0.03, and 0.87 ± 0.02 for the large bowel, stomach, small bowel, duodenum, and pancreas, respectively. The performance decreased with increased SIs from the guidance slice. The DL-SAS method performed significantly better (P < .05) than the other 3 methods. The ROA values were in the range of 48% to 66% for all the organs with an SI of 1 for DL-SAS, higher than those for linear interpolation (31%-57% for an SI of 1) and DL auto-segmentation (16%-51%).

conclusionsThe developed DL-SAS model segmented complex abdominal structures on MRI with high accuracy and efficiency and may be implemented as an interactive manual contouring tool or a contour editing tool in conjunction with a full autosegmentation process, facilitating fast and accurate segmentation for MRI-guided online adaptive radiation therapy.

Indexed as

Deep LearningRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID35667525
PMCPMC9639200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.