Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35667401›Full record

ArticleIndian heart journal

Short term outcomes with dual chamber versus single chamber pacing for atrioventricular block - A crossover trial.

Ragavendra Chanthanamuthu, Sakthivel Ramasamy, Ashish Jain, Avinash Anantharaj, Ajith Ananthakrishna Pillai, Santhosh Satheesh, Raja J Selvaraj

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian heart journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ragavendra ChanthanamuthuDepartment of Cardiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Sakthivel RamasamyDepartment of Cardiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Ashish JainDepartment of Cardiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Avinash AnantharajDepartment of Cardiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Ajith Ananthakrishna PillaiDepartment of Cardiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Santhosh SatheeshDepartment of Cardiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Raja J SelvarajDepartment of Cardiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India. Electronic address: raja.selvaraj@jipmer.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A total of 42 patients were studied for primary outcomes of quality of life and 6MWD between VVIR and DDD modes. At end of 2 months after device implantation, randomization was done and the device was programmed to VVIR or DDD modes. At the end of 2 months in this mode QOL and functional was assessed and the patient was switched to other mode. The same protocol was followed at the end of 2 months. We found no difference in functional capacity and quality of life between the two pacing modes. None of the patients developed pacemaker syndrome and there was no preference for any of the modes.

Indexed as

Atrioventricular BlockPacemaker, ArtificialCardiac Pacing, ArtificialCross-Over StudiesHumansQuality of LifeComplete heart blockMode selectionPacemaker

Identifiers

PMID35667401
PMCPMC9453048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.